Internet-Draft | registries | October 2021 |
Wiethuechter, et al. | Expires 26 April 2022 | [Page] |
TODO¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 26 April 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶
TODO¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
See [drip-requirements] for common DRIP terms.¶
This section introduces the terms "Claims", "Assertions", "Attestations", and "Certificates" as used in DRIP. In DRIP certificate has a different context compared with security certificates and Public Key Infrastructure used in X.509.¶
Claims:¶
Assertions:¶
Attestations:¶
Certificates:¶
All Attestations and Certificates under DRIP share the following format:¶
This can be any one of the following:¶
A specific definition of an Attestation or Certificate defines which of these are used.¶
Two Attestation's remove this field: MutualAttestation Section 4.2.4 and LinkAttestation Section 4.2.5 as their definition clearly states that the signer is the second party with their HHIT or SelfAttestation already embedded in the Attestation Data.¶
The data being attested to. It can be one of the following forms:¶
This field is variable length with no limit and specific definitions of an Attestation or Certificate indicate the fields, size and ordering.¶
TODO¶
The only attestation to use a claim (the Host Identity) in the Attestation Data
with the HHIT acting as the Attestor Identity Information
.¶
(Editors Note: blurb here?)¶
In constrained environments and when there is the guarantee of being able to lookup the HHITs to obtain HIs this attestation can be used.¶
An attestation that perform a sign over an existing Attestation where the signer is the second party of the embedded attestation.¶
This Attestation is one of two that does not fill in the Attestor Identity Information
(Section 4.1.1) as the data is already present in the Attestation Data
(Section 4.1.2) in the form of Y's SelfAttestation.¶
The unique size of this attestation (384-bytes) allows for easy detection and subsequent decoding without issue.¶
An attestations that perform a sign over an existing ConciseAttestation where the signer is the second party of the embedded attestation.¶
This Attestation is one of two that does not fill in the Attestor Identity Information
(Section 4.1.1) as the data is already present in the Attestation Data
(Section 4.1.2) in the form of Y's HHIT.¶
The unique size of this attestation (176-bytes) allows for easy detection and subsequent decoding without issue.¶
Required by DRIP Authentication Formats for Broadcast RID (Editor Note: add link to draft here) to satisfy [drip-requirements] GEN-1 and GEN-3.¶
In DRIP certificates are signed by a third party that has no stake in the claims/assertions/attestations being attested to.¶
It is analogous to a third party in legal system that signs a document as a "witness" and bears no responsibility in the document.¶
Under DRIP there 3 classes of registries, with specific variants in each.¶
This is a special registry holding the RAA value of 0 and HDA value of 0. It delegates out RAA values only to registries that wish to act as an RAA.¶
(Editors Note: we contemplate this is ICAO running this server or federation of them)¶
TODO¶
Hold RAA values of 2+ and HDA value of 0.¶
Most are contemplated to be Civil Aviation Authorities (CAAs) then delegate HDAs to manage their NAS.¶
A special registry that hands out HDA values to participating Manufacturer's that hold an ICAO Manufacturer Code used in ANSI CTA2063-A Serial Numbers.¶
It is holds the RAA value of 1 and HDA value of 0.¶
(Editors Note: we contemplate this is ICAO running this server or federation of them)¶
A registry run by a manufacturer of UAS systems that participate in Remote ID. Stores UAS Serial Numbers under a specific ICAO Manufacturer Code (assigned to the manufacturer by ICAO).¶
A DET can be encoded into a Serial Number (Editor Note: link to -uas-rid) and when done so this registry would hold a mapping from the Serial Number to the DET and its artifacts.¶
Hold RAA values of 1 and HDA value of 1+.¶
Registry that holds the binding between a UAS Session ID (for DRIP the DET) and the UA Serial Number. The Serial Number MUST have its access protected to allow only authorized parties to obtain. The Serial Number SHOULD be encrypted in a way the authorized party can decrypt.¶
As part of the UTM system they also hold a binding between a UAS ID (Serial Number or Session ID) and an Operational Intent.¶
(Editors Note: these are contemplated to be part of a USS as a function or a standalone SDSP in the UTM system)¶
Hold RAA values of 2+ and HDA value of 1+.¶
(Editors Note: Due to nature of HHIT we could have multiple registries with same RAA/HDA pairings running and being federated together. How do we handle this?)¶
Under DRIP there are a number of FQDN forms used to allow lookups to take place.¶
Serial Number: 8653FZ2T7B8RA85D19LX ICAO Mfr Code: 8653 Length Code: F ID: FZ2T7B8RA85D19LX FQDN: Z2T7B8RA85D19LX.F.8653.mfr.remoteid.aero¶
DET: 2001:0030:00a0:0145:a3ad:1952:0ad0:a69e ID: a3ad:1952:0ad0:a69e OGA: 5 HDA: 0014 = 20 RAA: 000a = 10 FQDN: a3ad19520ad0a69e.5.20.10.det.remoteid.aero¶
(Editors Note: do we want to convert HDA/RAA to int or leave as hex?)¶
(Editors Note: DNS is case-sensitive in my experience, do we do all upper case?)¶
(Editors Note: do we support condensed ipv6 forms? - instinct is no as dns case-sensitive so it would be considered a different fqdn entirely)¶
DRIP requires a number of resource records, some specific to certain registries to function.¶
All registries will have their own DET associated with them and their respective DNS server will hold a HIP RR that is pointed to by their DET FQDN.¶
MRA and RIDR servers will also have HIP RRs for their registered parties (aircraft and operators).¶
Most attestations can be placed into DNS. An exception to this is the AttestationCertificate made during Session ID registration.¶
Along with their associated "glue" record (A/AAAA) supports the traversal in DNS across the tree.¶
<mfr.remoteid.aero>
on Root points to specific DET FQDN of IRM¶
<icao_mfr_code>.mfr.remoteid.aero
on IRM points to specific DET FQDN of MRA¶
<raa_value>.det.remoteid.aero
on Root pointing to DET FQDN of matching RAA¶
<hda_value>.<raa_value>.det.remoteid.aero
on RAA Registry pointing to DET FQDN of matching HDA¶
(Editors Note: General processing instructions here?)¶
As a general rule the following processing performed for any registration operation:¶
Specifically handled by the Root Registry (Section 5.1.1).¶
Specifically handled by the Root Registry (Section 5.1.1).¶
Specifically handled by an RAA (Section 5.1.2).¶
Specifically handled by the IRM Registry (Section 5.1.2.1).¶
Required on IRM:¶
NS RR = <icao_mfr_code>.mfr.remoteid.aero NS <mra_det_fqdn>
¶
NS RR = <hda_value>.1.det.remoteid.aero NS <mra_det_fqdn>
¶
AAAA RR = <mra_det_fqdn> AAAA ...
¶
CERT RR = ???¶
Required on MRA:¶
HIP RR = <mra_det_fqdn> HIP ...
¶
CERT RR = ???¶
(HDA value, MRA Details)¶
Specifically handled by a MRA (Section 5.1.3.1).¶
Required on MRA:¶
A/AAAA with Serial Number FQDN (Section 6.1)¶
Optional on MRA:¶
HIP RR of Aircraft with DET FQDN (Section 6.2) (<sn_det_fqdn> HIP ...
)¶
CERT RRs of SelfAttestation and BroadcastAttestation¶
(Serial Number, [DET], Metadata, [SelfAttestation])¶
Specifically handled by a RIDR (Section 5.1.3.2).¶
Optional on RIDR:¶
HIP RR of Operator¶
CERT RRs SelfAttestation of Operator, A-ro¶
TODO¶
Specifically handled by a RIDR (Section 5.1.3.2).¶
Required on RIDR:¶
HIP RR of Aircraft with DET FQDN (Section 6.2) (<session_det_fqdn> HIP ...
)¶
CERT RRs for SelfAttestation of Aircraft, BroadcastAttestation¶
(Session ID, Serial Number, GUFI, A-oa, BA-ra, AC-roa)¶
Under DRIP UAS RID a special provisioning procedure is required to properly generate and distribute the certificates and attestations to all parties in the USS/UTM ecosystem using DRIP RID.¶
Keypairs are expected to be generated on the device hardware it will be used on. Due to hardware limitations (see Section 10) and connectivity it is acceptable under DRIP RID to generate keypairs for the Aircraft on Operator devices and later securely inject them into the Aircraft (as defined in Section 9.6.2). The methods to securely inject and store keypair information in a "secure element" of the Aircraft is out of scope of this document.¶
In DRIP, each Operator MUST generate a Host Identity of the Operator (HIo) and derived Hierarchical HIT of the Operator (HHITo). These are registered with a Private Information Registry along with whatever Operator data (inc. PII) is required by the cognizant CAA and the registry. In response, the Operator will obtain an attestation from the Registry, Attestation: Registry on Operator (A-ro), signed with the Host Identity of the Registry private key (HIr(priv)) proving such registration.¶
An Operator may now claim one or more UA.¶
The operator then MUST provision the UA with HIa, HIa(priv), HHITa and B-Ara.¶
Under the FAA [NPRM], it is expecting that IDs for UAS are assigned by the UTM and are generally one-time use. The methods for this however are unspecified leaving two options.¶
In either case the Registry must decide on if the HI/HHIT pairing is valid. This in its simplest form is checking the current Registry for a collision on the HHIT.¶
Upon accepting a HI/HHIT pair the Registry MUST populate the required the DNS serving the HDA with the HIP RR and other relevant RR types (such as TXT and CERT). The Registry MUST also generate the appropriate Attestation for the given operation.¶
If the Registry denied the HI/HHIT pair, because there was a HHIT collision or any other reason, the Registry MUST signal back to the device being provisioned that a new HI needs to be generated.¶
(Editor Note: this should break down the individual registrations between Root/RAA, RAA/HDA and their special variants).¶
TODO¶
DRIP UAS RID defines two levels of hierarchy maintained by the Registration Assigning Authority (RAA) and HHIT Domain Authority (HDA). The authors anticipate that an RAA is owned and operated by a regional CAA (or a delegated party by an CAA in a specific airspace region) with HDAs being contracted out. As such a chain of trust for registries is required to ensure trustworthiness is not compromised. More information on the registries can be found in [hhit-registries].¶
Both the RAA and HDA generate their own keypairs and self-signed attestations (SelfAttestation: RAA on RAA and SelfAttestation: HDA on HDA respectively). The HDA sends to the RAA its self-signed attestation to be added into the RAA DNS.¶
The RAA confirms the attestation received is valid and that no HHIT collisions occur before added a HIP RR to its DNS for the new HDA. An Attestation: RAA on HDA (A-rh) is sent as a confirmation that provisioning was successful.¶
The HDA is now a valid "Registry" and uses its keypair and SelfAttestation: HDA on HDA (SA-hh) with all provisioning requests from downstream.¶
During the initial configuration and production at the factory the Aircraft MUST be configured to have a serial number. ASTM defines this to be an ANSI/CTA-2063A. Under DRIP a HHIT can be encoded as such to be able to convert back and forth between them. This is out of scope for this document. TODO: link from UAS RID document.¶
Under DRIP the Manufacturer SHOULD be using HHITs and have their own keypair and SA-mm (SelfAttestation: Manufacturer on Manufacturer). (Ed. Note: some words on aircraft keypair and certs here?).¶
SelfAttestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft 0 (SA-a0a0) is extracted by the manufacturer and sent to their Certificate Authority (CA) to be verified and added. A resulting attestation (Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 [A-ma0]) SHOULD be a DRIP Attestation - however this could be a X.509 certificate binding the serial number to the manufacturer.¶
The Operator generates a keypair and HHIT as specified in DRIP UAS RID. A self-signed attestation (Attestation: Operator on Operator [SA-oo]) is generated and sent to the desired Registry (HDA). Other relevant information and possibly personally identifiable information needed may also be required to be sent to the Registry (all over a secure channel - the method of which is out of scope for this document).¶
The Registry cross checks any personally identifiable information as required. Certificate: Operator on Operator is verified (both using the expiration timestamp and signature). The HHIT is searched in the Registries database to confirm that no collision occurs. A new attestation is generated (Attestation: Registry on Operator) and sent securely back to the Operator. Optionally the HHIT/HI pairing can be added to the Registries DNS in to form of a HIP Resource Record (RR). Other RRs, such as CERT and TXT, may also be used to hold public information.¶
With the receipt of Attestation: Registry on Operator (A-ro) the provisioning of an Operator is complete.¶
Under standard provisioning the Aircraft has its own connectivity to the Registry, the method which is out of scope for this document.¶
Through mechanisms not specified in this document the Aircraft should have methods to instruct the Aircraft onboard systems to generate a keypair and certificate. This certificate is chained to the factory provisioned certificate (SelfAttestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft 0 [SA-a0a0]). This new attestation (Attestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft N [A-a0aN]) is securely extracted by the Operator.¶
With A-a0aN the sub-attestation (SelfAttestation: Aircraft N on Aircraft N [SA-aNaN]) is used by the Operator to generate Attestation: Operator on Aircraft N (A-oaN). This along with Attestation: Registry on Operator (A-ro) is sent to the Registry.¶
On the Registry, A-ro is verified and used as confirmation that the Operator is already registered. A-oaN also undergoes a validation check and used to generate a token to return to the Operator to continue provisioning.¶
Upon receipt of this token, the Operator injects it into the Aircraft and its used to form a secure connection to the Registry. The Aircraft then sends Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 (A-ma0) and Attestation: Aircraft 0 to Aircraft N (A-a0aN).¶
The Registry uses Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 (with an external database if supported) to confirm the validity of the Aircraft. Attestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft N is correlated with Attestation: Operator on Aircraft N and Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 to see the chain of ownership. The new HHIT tied to Aircraft N is then checked for collisions in the HDA. With the information the Registry generates two items: AttestationCertificate: Registry on Operator on Aircraft N (AC-roaN) and BroadcastAttestation: Registry on Aircraft N (BA-raN). A HIP RR (and other RR types as needed) are generated and inserted into the HDA.¶
AC-roaN is sent via a secure channel back to the Operator to be stored. ABA-raN is sent to the Aircraft to be used in Broadcast RID as specified in (Editors Note: add link to -auth-formats).¶
This provisioning scheme is for when the Aircraft is unable to connect to the Registry itself or does not have the hardware required to generate keypairs and certificates.¶
To start the Operator generates on behalf of the Aircraft a new keypair and Attestation: Aircraft N on Aircraft N (SA-aNaN). This keypair and certificate are injected into the Aircraft for it to generate Attestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft N (A-a0aN). After injecting the keypair and certificate, the Operator MUST destroy all copies of the keypair.¶
Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 (A-ma0) and Attestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft N (A-a0aN) is extracted by the Operator and the following data items are sent to the Registry; Attestation: Registry on Operator (A-ro), Attestation: Manufacturer on Aircraft 0 (A-ma0), Attestation: Aircraft 0 on Aircraft N (A-a0aN), Attestation: Operator on Aircraft N (A-oaN).¶
On the Registry validation checks are done on all attestations as per the previous sections. Once complete then the Registry checks for a HHIT collision, adding to the HDA if clear and generates AttestationCertificate: Registry on Operator on Aircraft N (AC-roaN) and BroadcastAttestation: Registry on Aircraft N (BA-raN). Both are sent back to the Operator.¶
The Operator securely inject BA-raN and securely stores AC-roaN of Aircraft N.¶
A special form of provisioning is used when the Aircraft is first sold to an Operator. Instead of generating a new keypair, the built in keypair and certificate done by the Manufacturer is used to provision and register the aircraft to the owner.¶
For this either Standard or Operator Assisted methods can be used.¶