Internet-Draft COSE Algorithms November 2019
Schaad Expires 20 May 2020 [Page]
Workgroup:
Network Working Group
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
J. Schaad
August Cellars

CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Additional Algorithms

Abstract

The CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) syntax [I-D.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct] allows for adding additional algorithms to the registries. This document adds one additional key wrap algorithm to the registry using the AES Wrap with Padding Algorithm [RFC5649].

Contributing to this document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The source for this draft is being maintained in GitHub. Suggested changes should be submitted as pull requests at https://github.com/cose-wg/X509 Editorial changes can be managed in GitHub, but any substantial issues need to be discussed on the COSE mailing list.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 20 May 2020.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) syntax [I-D.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct] is defined to have an object based set of security primatives using CBOR [I-D.ietf-cbor-7049bis] for use in constrained environments. COSE has algorithm agility so that documents like this one can register algorithms which are needed.

In this document we add the AES Wrap with Padding algorithm to the registry and describe how to use it.

1.1. Requirements Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

1.2. Open Issues

This section is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

2. AES Key Wrap with Padding

The AES Key Wrap with Padding is defined in [RFC5649]. This algorithm uses an AES key to wrap a value that is a multiple of 8 bits. As such, it can be used to wrap not only the key sizes for the content encryption algorithms, but additionally it can be used to encrypt off size keys that can be used with the keyed hash functions or key derivation functions. The algorithm uses a single fixed parameter, the initial value. This value is fixed in section 3 of [RFC5649], this is a different value from that used for the AES Key Wrap algorithm of [RFC3394]. There are no public parameters that very on a per-invocation bases. This algorithm does not support additional data and thus the protected header field MUST be empty.

When using a COSE key for this algorithm, the following checks are made:

Table 1: AES Key Wrap Algorithm Values
Name Value Key Size Description
A128KW-Pad TBD1 128 AES Key Wrap w/padding and a 128-bit key
A192KW-Pad TBD2 192 AES Key Wrap w/padding and a 192-bit key
A256KW-Pad TBD3 256 AES Key Wrap w/padding and a 256-bit key

2.1. Security Considerations for AES-KW with Padding

The shared secret needs to have some method to be regularly updated over time. The shared secret is the basis of trust.

3. References

3.1. Normative References

[I-D.ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct]
Schaad, J., "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE): Structures and Process", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-06, , <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-06>.
[I-D.ietf-cbor-7049bis]
Bormann, C. and P. Hoffman, "Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-07, , <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-cbor-7049bis-07>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC5649]
Housley, R. and M. Dworkin, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap with Padding Algorithm", RFC 5649, DOI 10.17487/RFC5649, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5649>.
[RFC3394]
Schaad, J. and R. Housley, "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Key Wrap Algorithm", RFC 3394, DOI 10.17487/RFC3394, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3394>.

Author's Address

Jim Schaad
August Cellars