Internet-Draft | EVPN Multicast on EEG | October 2022 |
Rabadan, et al. | Expires 27 April 2023 | [Page] |
This document proposes an EVPN (Ethernet Virtual Private Network) extension to allow IP multicast forwarding on Service Gateways that interconnect two or more EVPN domains.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 April 2023.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
This document proposes an EVPN extension to allow IP multicast forwarding on Service Gateways that interconnect two or more EVPN domains. The extensions are applied in two separate scenarios:¶
In Layer-2 Interconnect scenarios, this document extends the procedures in [RFC9251] so that IP Multicast can be forwarded efficiently in Service Gateways that Interconnect two or more EVPN domains. Note that [RFC9014], in sections 4.4 and 4.6, specifies the Service Gateway solution for EVPN layer-2 multi-point services, including the procedures for layer-2 unicast and Broadcast, Unknown unicast and Multicast (BUM) traffic, however, it does not specify procedures to optimize the forwarding of IP Multicast on the Service Gateways that interconnect domains that use EVPN IGMP or MLD proxy procedures.¶
In Layer-3 Interconnect scenarios, this document extends the procedures in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast], so that Service Gateways that interconnect two or more EVPN layer-3 domains as in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking] for IP unicast traffic can forward Inter-Subnet Multicast traffic efficiently across EVPN layer-3 domains. [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast] defines procedures to support efficient Inter-Subnet Multicast forwarding on Service Gateways that interconnect EVPN domains to MVPN [RFC6513] [RFC6514] or PIM domains [RFC7761]. This document completes the procedures to support efficient Inter-Subnet Multicast forwarding on Service Gateways that interconnect EVPN domains to other EVPN domains.¶
In both scenarios, we refer to the Service Gateway that implements this specification as an EVPN to EVPN Gateway (EEG).¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
This section describes an example of the first use-case for which this document specifies extensions.¶
Consider a pair of multi-homing Service Gateways (EEG1 and EEG2) that interconnect EVPN domain 1:1 and domain 2:2, as illustrated in Figure 1 (with 1:1 and 2:2 being the respective domain-IDs [I-D.sr-bess-evpn-dpath]). In addition to EEG1 and EEG2, PE1 and PE2 are also attached to EVPN domain 1:1 (with 1:1 being the EVPN domain-ID), and PE3, PE4 and PE5 are also attached to domain 2:2. Source S1, Receiver-1, Receiver-2 and Receiver-3 are all connected to the same IP subnet and EVPN Broadcast Domain BD1. For unicast traffic, EEG1 and EEG2 follow the procedures in [RFC9014] sections 4.4 and 4.6. In particular, the Interconnect Ethernet Segment I-ES1 is instantiated in EEG1 and EEG2 and determines the redundancy and forwarding of the traffic between the two domains, being e.g., EEG1 the Designated Forwarder and EEG2 the non-Designated Forwarder routers in I-ES1. 'Encap1' and 'encap2' in Figure 1 refer to any possible encapsulation that is supported by EVPN and BD1 uses to transmit or receive packets; for instance: MPLS, Segment Routing MPLS (SR-MPLS), VXLAN or SRv6. The procedures in this document apply irrespective of the combination of encapsulations being used in the EVPN domains that the EEG routers are interconnecting. In this scenario, IP Multicast sources and receivers can be attached to either domain and the EEG routers must be able to forward IP Multicast traffic efficiently across domains. PE1, PE2, PE3, PE4 and PE5 follow the procedures of [RFC9251], and they are not aware of being attached to different EVPN domains.¶
Suppose S1 (with source IP address S1) sends IP multicast traffic to group G2, and Receiver-1 and Receiver-2 issue an IGMP (or MLD) join (*,G2). Receiver-3 sends an IGMP (or MLD) join (S1,G2). With the extensions in this document:¶
This section describes an example of the second use-case for which this document specifies extensions.¶
Similar to Figure 1 consider a pair of multi-homing Service Gateways (EEG1 and EEG2) that interconnect EVPN domain 1:1 and domain 2:2 that are now EVPN OISM domains [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast] for the same tenant, as illustrated in Figure 2. Note that Figure 2 is an example, the procedures in this document apply irrespective of the PEs being attached to the same or different Broadcast Domains, and sources and receivers can be connected to any PE or Broadcast Domain in the network, and also be in the same or different subnets. The IP-VRF of the EEG routers imports EVPN IP Prefix routes [RFC9136] from one domain, install the routes in the IP-VRF and export the routes into EVPN IP Prefix routes into the other domains. In order to do that, the EEG nodes follow the gateway procedures in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking]. The unicast routes in the IP-VRF of the EEG routers are used to create IIF entries in the layer-3 multicast states. In case the same IP prefix is received in two different EVPN IP Prefix routes, one from each EVPN domain, regular best path selection determines what EVPN IP Prefix route is selected and therefore what route is installed and exported into the other domain.¶
The encapsulations used in the EVPN domains can be any possible encapsulation that is supported by EVPN, for instance, MPLS, Segment Routing MPLS (SR-MPLS), VXLAN or SRv6. The procedures in this document apply irrespective of the combinations of encapsulations being used in the EVPN domains that the EEG routers are interconnecting. In this scenario, IP Multicast sources and receivers can be attached to either domain and the EEG routers must be able to forward IP Multicast traffic efficiently across domains. PE1, PE2, PE3, PE4 and PE5 follow the procedures of [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast]. We assume PE1 and PE2 are attached to the Supplementary Broadcast Domain SBD1, whereas PE3, PE4 and PE5 are attached to the Supplementary Broadcast Domain SBD2. In this model, existing EVPN OISM PEs are unaware that certain sources or receivers are part of a different EVPN OISM Domain. The existing EVPN OISM nodes run only their standard [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast] procedures and are entirely unaware of the remote EVPN OISM domains. Interworking is achieved by having some of the EVPN OISM PEs function as EVPN to EVPN Gateways (EEGs) running OISM procedures in all the domains they interconnect, as detailed in this document.¶
In the example of Figure 2, suppose S1 (with source IP address S1) sends IP multicast traffic for group G2, and Receiver-1 and Receiver-2 issue an IGMP (or MLD) join (*,G2). Receiver-3 sends an IGMP (or MLD) join (S1,G2). With the extensions in this document:¶
This section provides the specification for EVPN to EVPN Gateways (EEGs) when configured for layer-2 interconnect, as in the use case of Section 1.2.¶
An EEG configured for layer-2 interconnect of two or more domains MUST support the procedures in [RFC9014] in sections 4.4 or 4.6 for unicast and BUM traffic forwarding. In addition, this specification uses the concept of the EVPN domain in [I-D.sr-bess-evpn-dpath]:¶
An EEG MUST import SMET routes received for the BD to which the EEG is attached.¶
Upon receiving and importing an SMET route in a domain, an EEG that is not part of an Interconnect Ethernet Segment MUST perform the proxy function for that SMET route into the other domain(s) of the Broadcast Domains, as follows:¶
Two or more EEG routers attached to the same two EVPN domains of a BD SHOULD use an Interconnect Ethernet Segment (I-ES) [RFC9014] to handle the redundancy and avoid multicast duplication, as follows:¶
In case of two or more EEG routers are attached to the same two EVPN domains of a BD, a control plane loop may be produced if the non-Designated Forwarder does proxy of the received SMET routes from the peer EEG into the other domain. In order to avoid that, the D-PATH [I-D.sr-bess-evpn-dpath] attribute SHOULD be used as follows:¶
An EEG router MAY support local sources and receivers attached to the BD. Local sources/receivers are considered to be part of a "local" domain in the BD, as described in [I-D.sr-bess-evpn-dpath] for local Attachment Circuits on the Service Gateways.¶
This section provides the specification for EVPN to EVPN Gateways (EEGs) when configured for layer-3 interconnect, as in the use case of Section 1.2. It is important to note that this specification uses a Supplementary Broadcast Domain (SBD) per domain that the EEG is interconnecting as a way to explain the procedures as simplified as possible, however, any implementation that uses a single SBD per tenant, and produces the same control plane and data plane behavior from an external standpoint, is considered compliant with this document.¶
An EEG configured for layer-3 interconnect of two or more domains MUST support the gateway procedures in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking] section 8, for IP unicast forwarding between two EVPN domains. To differentiate an EVPN domain in Section 2 from an EVPN domain in a layer-3 interconnect context, this section refers to EVPN domains "of an IP-VRF" on the EEG, as opposed to EVPN domains "of a BD" in Section 2.¶
An EEG creates one SBD instance per domain the IP-VRF is interconnecting. The SBD concept is specified in [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast], only that this specification allows more than one SBD per IP-VRF on the EEG routers.¶
An SBD-DR MUST be selected for each SBD to which the EEG is attached, however the SBD-DR election MAY be run into only one of the SBDs of the IP-VRF, and the same SBD-DR EEG derived for all SBDs of the IP-VRF.¶
This document extends the procedures of [RFC9251] and [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast], in the scenarios described by [RFC9014] and [I-D.ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking]. Therefore it inherits all the Security Considerations described in all those specifications. In addition, this document now allows the distribution of SMET routes across EVPN domains, and therefore provides a new tool for an attacker to be able to leak SMET routes into a remote EVPN domain that could not receive SMET routes from a remote domain prior to this specification. An attacker that manages to leak SMET routes into remote domains, may attract multicast traffic that may not be leaked otherwise into the local domain.¶
This document requests a new Flag in the subregistry called "Multicast Flags Extended Community", under the "Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Extended Communities" registry, to indicate EEG support along with the IMET routes.¶