TOC |
|
This document defines two URI schemes that can be used to provision the configuration values needed by the resolution mechanism defined in [TURN‑RESOLV] (Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” February 2010.).
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 11, 2011.
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
1.
Introduction
2.
Syntax of a TURN or TURNS URI
3.
Security Considerations
4.
IANA Considerations
4.1.
TURN URI Registration
4.2.
TURNS URI Registration
5.
Acknowledgements
6.
References
6.1.
Normative References
6.2.
Informative References
Appendix A.
Release notes
A.1.
Modifications between petithuguenin-02 and petithuguenin-01
A.2.
Modifications between petithuguenin-01 and petithuguenin-00
A.3.
Design Notes
A.4.
Running Code Considerations
A.5.
TODO List
§
Author's Address
TOC |
[TURN‑RESOLV] (Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” February 2010.) defines a resolution mechanism to convert a secure flag, an host name or IP address, a eventually empty port, and an eventually empty transport to a list of IP address, port, and TURN transport tuples.
To simplify the provisioning of TURN clients, this document defines a TURN and a TURNS URI scheme that can carry the four components needed for the resolution mechanism.
TOC |
A TURN/TURNS URI has the following ABNF syntax [RFC5234] (Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.):
turnURI = scheme ":" turn-host [ ":" turn-port ] [ "?transport=" transport ] scheme = "turn" / "turns" transport = "udp" / "tcp" / transport-ext transport-ext = 1*unreserved turn-host = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name turn-port = *DIGIT IP-literal = "[" ( IPv6address / IPvFuture ) "]" IPvFuture = "v" 1*HEXDIG "." 1*( unreserved / sub-delims / ":" ) IPv6address = 6( h16 ":" ) ls32 / "::" 5( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ h16 ] "::" 4( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *1( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 3( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *2( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" 2( h16 ":" ) ls32 / [ *3( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 ":" ls32 / [ *4( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" ls32 / [ *5( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 / [ *6( h16 ":" ) h16 ] "::" h16 = 1*4HEXDIG ls32 = ( h16 ":" h16 ) / IPv4address IPv4address = dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet "." dec-octet dec-octet = DIGIT ; 0-9 / %x31-39 DIGIT ; 10-99 / "1" 2DIGIT ; 100-199 / "2" %x30-34 DIGIT ; 200-249 / "25" %x30-35 ; 250-255 reg-name = *( unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims )
<unreserved>, <sub-delims>, and <pct-encoded> are specified in [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.).
<secure> is equal to false is <scheme> is equal to "turn" and equal to false if <scheme> is equal to "turns".
TOC |
Security considerations for the resolution mechanism are discussed in [TURN‑RESOLV] (Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” February 2010.).
The "turn" and "turns" URI schemes do not introduce any specific security issues beyond the security considerations discussed in [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.).
TOC |
This section contains the registration information for the "turn" and "turns" URI Schemes (in accordance with [RFC4395] (Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, “Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes,” February 2006.)).
TOC |
URI scheme name: turn
Status: permanent
URI scheme syntax: See Section 2 (Syntax of a TURN or TURNS URI).
URI scheme semantics: See [TURN‑RESOLV] (Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” February 2010.).
Encoding considerations: There are no encoding considerations beyond those in [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.).
Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:
The "turn" URI scheme is intended to be used by applications that might need access to a TURN server.
Interoperability considerations: N/A
Security considerations: See Section 3 (Security Considerations).
Contact: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Author/Change controller: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
References: This document.
[Note to RFC Editor: Replace "This document" with reference to this document]
TOC |
URI scheme name: turns
Status: permanent
URI scheme syntax: See Section 2 (Syntax of a TURN or TURNS URI).
URI scheme semantics: See [TURN‑RESOLV] (Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” February 2010.).
Encoding considerations: There are no encoding considerations beyond those in [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.).
Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name:
The "turns" URI scheme is intended to be used by applications that might need access to a TURN server.
Interoperability considerations: N/A
Security considerations: See Section 3 (Security Considerations).
Contact: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Author/Change controller: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
References: This document.
[Note to RFC Editor: Replace "This document" with reference to this document]
TOC |
Thanks to Margaret Wasserman, Magnus Westerlund, Juergen Schoenwaelder, Sean Turner, Ted Hardie, Dave Thaler, Alfred E. Heggestad, Eilon Yardeni, Dan Wing, Alfred Hoenes, and Jim Kleck for their comments, suggestions and questions that helped to improve this document.
The <turn-port> and <turn-host> ABNF productions have been copied from the <port> and <host> ABNF productions from [RFC3986] (Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” January 2005.).
This document was written with the xml2rfc tool described in [RFC2629] (Rose, M., “Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML,” June 1999.).
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC3986] | Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, “Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax,” STD 66, RFC 3986, January 2005 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC5234] | Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008 (TXT). |
[TURN-RESOLV] | Petit-Huguenin, M., “Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Resolution Mechanism,” draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-10 (work in progress), February 2010 (TXT). |
TOC |
[RFC2629] | Rose, M., “Writing I-Ds and RFCs using XML,” RFC 2629, June 1999 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC4395] | Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, “Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes,” BCP 35, RFC 4395, February 2006 (TXT). |
TOC |
This section must be removed before publication as an RFC.
TOC |
TOC |
TOC |
TOC |
TOC |
(Empty)
TOC |
Marc Petit-Huguenin | |
Unaffiliated | |
Email: | petithug@acm.org |