| Internet-Draft | IMAP PARTIAL | January 2022 |
| Melnikov, et al. | Expires 16 July 2022 | [Page] |
The PARTIAL extension of the Internet Message Access Protocol (RFC 3501/RFC 9051) allows clients to limit the number of search results returned, as well as to perform incremental (paged) searches. This also helps servers to optimize resource usage when performing searches.¶
This document extends PARTIAL SEARCH return option originally specified in RFC 5267. It also clarifies some interactions between RFC 5267 and RFC 4731/RFC 9051.¶
This document also describes the MESSAGELIMIT extension for announcing a limit on the number of messages that can be processed in a single FETCH/SEARCH/STORE/COPY/MOVE command.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 16 July 2022.¶
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.¶
This document defines an extension to the Internet Message Access Protocol [RFC3501] for performing incremental searches and fetches. This extension is compatible with both IMAP4rev1 [RFC3501] and IMAP4rev2 [RFC9051].¶
The PARTIAL extension of the Internet Message Access Protocol (RFC 3501/RFC 9051) allows clients to limit the number of search results returned, as well as to perform incremental (paged) searches. This also helps servers to optimize resource usage when performing searches.¶
This document extends PARTIAL SEARCH return option originally specified in RFC 5267. It also clarifies some interactions between RFC 5267 and RFC 4731/RFC 9051.¶
This document also describes the MESSAGELIMIT extension for announcing a limit on the number of messages that can be processed in a single FETCH/SEARCH/STORE/COPY/MOVE command.¶
In protocol examples, this document uses a prefix of "C: " to denote lines sent by the client to the server, and "S: " for lines sent by the server to the client. Lines prefixed with "// " are comments explaining the previous protocol line. These prefixes and comments are not part of the protocol. Lines without any of these prefixes are continuations of the previous line, and no line break is present in the protocol unless specifically mentioned.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
Other capitalised words are IMAP keywords [RFC3501][RFC9051] or keywords from this document.¶
An IMAP server advertises support for the PARTIAL extension by including "PARTIAL" capability in the CAPABILITY response/response code.¶
Clients that implement support for PARTIAL extension MUST also support the MESSAGELIMIT response code (see Section 4).¶
The PARTIAL search return option causes the server to provide in an ESEARCH response a subset of the results denoted by the sequence range given as the mandatory argument. The first result (message with the lowest matching UID) is 1; thus, the first 500 results would be obtained by a return option of "PARTIAL 1:500", and the second 500 by "PARTIAL 501:1000". This intentionally mirrors message sequence numbers.¶
It is also possible to direct the server to start SEARCH from the latest matching (with the highest UID) message. This can be done by prepeding "-" to the index. For example -1 is the last message, -2 is next to the last and so on. Using this syntax helps server implementations to optimize their SEARCHes.¶
A single command MUST NOT contain more than one PARTIAL or ALL search return option -- that is, either one PARTIAL, one ALL, or neither PARTIAL nor ALL is allowed.¶
For SEARCH results, the entire result list MUST be ordered in mailbox order, that is, in UID or message sequence number order.¶
Where a PARTIAL search return option references results that do not exist, by using a range which starts or ends higher (or lower) than the current number of results, then the server returns the results that are in the set. This yields a PARTIAL return data item that has, as payload, the original range and a potentially missing set of results that may be shorter than the extent of the range. If the whole range references results that do not exist, a special value "NIL" is returned by the server instead of the sequence set.¶
Clients need not request PARTIAL results in any particular order. Because mailboxes may change, clients might wish to use PARTIAL in combination with UPDATE (see [RFC5267] if the server also advertises CONTEXT=SEARCH capability, especially if the intent is to walk a large set of results; however, these return options do not interact -- the UPDATE will provide notifications for all matching results.¶
// Let's assume that the A01 SEARCH without PARTIAL would return
// 23764 results.
C: A01 UID SEARCH RETURN (PARTIAL -1:-100) UNDELETED
UNKEYWORD $Junk
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A01") UID PARTIAL (-1:-100 ...)
// 100 most recent results in set syntax elided.
S: A01 OK Completed.
¶
// Let's assume that the A02 SEARCH without PARTIAL would return
// 23764 results.
C: A02 UID SEARCH RETURN (PARTIAL 23500:24000) UNDELETED
UNKEYWORD $Junk
C: A03 UID SEARCH RETURN (PARTIAL 1:500) UNDELETED
UNKEYWORD $Junk
C: A04 UID SEARCH RETURN (PARTIAL 24000:24500) UNDELETED
UNKEYWORD $Junk
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A02") UID PARTIAL (23500:24000 ...)
// 264 results in set syntax elided,
// this spans the end of the results.
S: A02 OK Completed.
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A03") UID PARTIAL (1:500 ...)
// 500 results in set syntax elided.
S: A03 OK Completed.
S: * ESEARCH (TAG "A04") UID PARTIAL (24000:24500 NIL)
// No results are present, this is beyond the end of the results.
S: A04 OK Completed.
¶
This section only applies if the server advertises PARTIAL IMAP capability or CONTEXT=SEARCH [RFC5267], together with ESEARCH [RFC4731] and/or IMAP4rev2"[RFC9051].¶
The SAVE result option doesn't change whether the server would return items corresponding to PARTIAL SEARCH result options.¶
As specified in Section 3.1, it is an error to specify both PARTIAL and ALL result options in the same SEARCH command.¶
When the SAVE result option is combined with the PARTIAL result option, and none of MIN/MAX/COUNT result options is present, the corresponding PARTIAL is returned, and the "$" marker would contain all messages returned by the PARTIAL result option.¶
When the SAVE + PARTIAL result options are combined with the MIN or the MAX result option, and the COUNT result option is absent, the corresponding PARTIAL result and MIN/MAX is returned (if the search result is not empty), and the "$" marker would contain all messages returned by the PARTIAL result option + the corresponding MIN/MAX message.¶
If the SAVE + PARTIAL result options are combined with both MIN and MAX result options, and the COUNT result options is absent, the PARTIAL, MIN and MAX are returned (if the search result is not empty), and the "$" marker would contain all messages returned by the PARTIAL result option plus MIN and MAX messages.¶
If the SAVE + PARTIAL result options are combined with the COUNT result option, the PARTIAL and COUNT are returned, and the "$" marker would always contain all messages found by the SEARCH or UID SEARCH command.¶
The following table summarizes the additional requirement on ESEARCH server implementations described in this section.¶
| Combination of Result option | "$" marker value |
|---|---|
| SAVE PARTIAL | PARTIAL |
| SAVE PARTIAL MIN | PARTIAL & MIN |
| SAVE PARTIAL MAX | PARTIAL & MAX |
| SAVE PARTIAL MIN MAX | PARTIAL & MIN & MAX |
| SAVE PARTIAL COUNT [m] | all found messages |
where '[m]' means optional "MIN" and/or "MAX"¶
The PARTIAL extension also extends the UID FETCH command with a PARTIAL FETCH modifier. The PARTIAL FETCH modifier has the same syntax as the PARTIAL SEARCH result option. Presence of the PARTIAL FETCH modifier instructs the server to only return FETCH results for messages in the specified range. It is useful when the sequence-set (first) parameter to the UID FETCH command includes unknown number of messages.¶
// Returning information for the last 3 messages in the UID range C: 10 UID FETCH 25900:26600 (UID FLAGS) (PARTIAL -1:-3) S: * 12888 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 25996) S: * 12889 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged \Answered) UID 25997) S: * 12890 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 26600) S: 10 OK FETCH completed¶
// Returning information for the first 5 messages in the UID range C: 11 UID FETCH 25900:26600 (UID FLAGS) (PARTIAL 1:5) S: * 12591 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 25900) S: * 12592 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged) UID 25902) S: * 12593 FETCH (FLAGS (\Answered) UID 26310) S: * 12594 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 26311) S: * 12595 FETCH (FLAGS (\Answered) UID 26498) S: 11 OK FETCH completed¶
This section is informative.¶
The PARTIAL FETCH modifier can be combined with the CHANGEDSINCE FETCH modifier.¶
// Returning information for the last 30 messages in the UID range // that have any flag/keyword modified since modseq 98305 C: 101 UID FETCH 25900:26600 (UID FLAGS) (PARTIAL -1:-30 CHANGEDSINCE 98305) S: * 12888 FETCH (FLAGS (\Flagged \Answered) MODSEQ (98306) UID 25997) S: * 12890 FETCH (FLAGS () MODSEQ (98312) UID 26600) S: 101 OK FETCH completed¶
The above example causes the server to first select the last 30 messages and then only return flag changes for subset of these messages which have MODSEQ higher than 98305.¶
Note that the order of PARTIAL and CHANGEDSINCE FETCH modifiers in the UID FETCH command is not important, i.e. the above example can also use "UID FETCH 25900:26600 (UID FLAGS) (CHANGEDSINCE 98305 PARTIAL -1:-30)" command and it would result in the same responses.¶
An IMAP server advertises support for the MESSAGELIMIT extension by including "MESSAGELIMIT=<limit>" capability in the CAPABILITY response/response code, where "<limit>" is a positive integer that conveys the maximum number of messages that can be processed in a single SEARCH/FETCH/STORE/COPY/MOVE command.¶
Do we need a way to specify SEARCH criterion for "all UIDs after" or "all UIDs before" a specific UID?¶
If a server implementation doesn't allow more than <N> messages to be operated on by a single SEARCH/FETCH/STORE/COPY/MOVE command, it MUST return the MESSAGELIMIT response code defined below:¶
C: 03 FETCH 10000:14589 (UID FLAGS)
S: * 14589 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 25000)
S: * 14588 FETCH (FLAGS (\Answered) UID 24998)
S: ... further 997 fetch responses
S: * 13590 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 23221)
S: 03 OK [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 23221] FETCH completed with 1000 partial
results
¶
C: 04 UID SEARCH UID 22000:25000 UNDELETED S: * SEARCH 25000 24998 (... 997 UIDs ...) 23221 S: 04 OK [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 23221] SEARCH completed with 1000 partial results¶
C: 05 UID COPY 18000:21000 "Trash" S: * NO [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 20001] Too many messages to copy S: 05 OK [COPYUID 1397597919 20001:21000 21363:22362] COPY completed for the last 1000 messages¶
C: 06 UID MOVE 18000:21000 "Archive/2021/2021-12" S: * OK [COPYUID 1397597919 20001:21000 22363:23362] Some messages were not moved S: * 12336 EXPUNGE S: * 12335 EXPUNGE ... S: * 11335 EXPUNGE S: 06 OK [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 20001] MOVE completed for the last 1000 messages¶
C: 07 UID STORE 18000:20000 +FLAGS (\Seen) S: * 11215 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) UID 20000) S: * 11214 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen \Answered \Deleted) UID 19998) ... S: * 10216 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 19578) S: 07 OK [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 19578] STORE completed for the last 1000 messages¶
C: 08 UID FETCH 22000:25000 (UID FLAGS MODSEQ) (PARTIAL -1:-1500) S: 08 NO [MESSAGELIMIT 1000] FETCH exceeds the maximum 1000 message limit¶
Note that when the server needs to return both EXPUNGEISSUED ([RFC9051]) and MESSAGELIMIT response codes, the former MUST be returned in the tagged OK response, while the latter MUST be returned in an untagged NO response. The following example demonstrates that:¶
C: 031 FETCH 10000:14589 (UID FLAGS)
S: * 14589 FETCH (FLAGS (\Seen) UID 25000)
S: * 14588 FETCH (FLAGS (\Answered) UID 24998)
S: ... further 997 fetch responses
S: * 13590 FETCH (FLAGS () UID 23221)
S: * NO [MESSAGELIMIT 1000 23221] FETCH completed with 1000 partial
results
S: 031 OK [EXPUNGEISSUED] Some messages were also expunged
¶
The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [ABNF].¶
Non-terminals referenced but not defined below are as defined by IMAP4 [RFC3501].¶
Except as noted otherwise, all alphabetic characters are case-insensitive. The use of upper or lower case characters to define token strings is for editorial clarity only. Implementations MUST accept these strings in a case-insensitive fashion.¶
SP = <Defined in RFC 5234>
MINUS = "-"
capability =/ "PARTIAL"
;; <capability> from [RFC3501]
modifier-partial = "PARTIAL" SP partial-range
partial-range-first = nz-number ":" nz-number
;; Request to search from oldest (lowest UIDs) to
;; more recent messages.
;; A range 500:400 is the same as 400:500.
;; This is similar to <seq-range> from [RFC3501],
;; but cannot contain "*".
partial-range-last = MINUS nz-number ":" MINUS nz-number
;; Request to search from newest (highest UIDs) to
;; oldest messages.
;; A range -500:-400 is the same as -400:-500.
partial-range = partial-range-first / partial-range-last
search-return-opt =/ modifier-partial
;; All conform to <search-return-opt>, from [IMAP-ABNF]/[RFC9051]
search-return-data =/ ret-data-partial
ret-data-partial = "PARTIAL"
SP "(" partial-range SP partial-results ")"
;; <partial-range> is the requested range.
partial-results = sequence-set / "NIL"
;; <sequence-set> from [RFC3501].
;; NIL indicates no results correspond to the requested range.
tagged-ext-simple =/ partial-range-last
fetch-modifier =/ modifier-partial
capability =/ "MESSAGELIMIT=" message-limit
;; <capability> from [RFC3501]
message-limit = nz-number
resp-text-code =/ "MESSAGELIMIT" SP message-limit [SP uniqueid]
;; No more than nz-number messages can be processed
;; by any command at a time. The last (lowest) processed
;; UID is uniqueid.
;; The last parameter is omitted, when not known.
¶
TBD.¶
IMAP4 capabilities are registered by publishing a standards track or IESG approved Informational or Experimental RFC. The registry is currently located at:¶
https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap4-capabilities¶
IANA is requested to add definition of the PARTIAL extension to point to this document.¶
This document was motivated by Yahoo! team and their questions about best client practices for dealing with large mailboxes.¶
Editor of this document would like to thank the following people who provided useful comments or participated in discussions of this document: Timo Sirainen.¶
This document uses lots of text from RFC 5267. Thus work of the RFC 5267 authors Dave Cridland and Curtis King is appreciated.¶