TOC |
|
PMIPv6 is designed to provide network based mobility, it requries no changes to the UE. There are proposals to extend PMIPv6 to support flow mobility. Flow mobility requries the UE and the network having communication protocol to carry the flow control messages. This document proposes to use the extended IKEv2 protocol to carry the flow control messages between the UE and network.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 11, 2011.
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
1.
Introduction
2.
Conventions used in this document
3.
Overview of using IKEv2 to carry flow control information
4.
IKEv2 configuration payload extension
5.
MN operation
6.
MAG operation
7.
LMA operation
8.
Security Considerations
9.
IANA Considerations
10.
References
10.1.
Normative References
10.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
TOC |
There are proposals to extend PMIPv6 to support flow mobility. But there is currently no protocol is specified between the UE and network which is used to carry the flow control policies. Since PMIPv6 is aimed to provide network based mobility solution and no UE changes is prefered, it is not feasible to define new protocol between the UE and network which is used to carry the flow control information. This document proposes to use extended IKE protocol to carry the flow control information.
TOC |
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL","SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
TOC |
IKEv2 is used for security parameter negotiation. It is usally used combine with IPSec. There are configuration payload options in IKEv2 which could be used for IP address allocation and other configuration purposes. This document proposes to extend the configuration payloads to carry the flow control information.
IKEv2/IPSec is also used for protecting mobility signalling in 3GPP. In 3GPP architecture, s2b interface is based on PMIP and used for un-trusted non-3GPP access. There is an IPSec tunnel between the UE and the un-trusted non- 3GPP access gateway(ePDG). This IPSec tunnel's security association and other security parameters are set up using IKEv2. Except for the security function, the IKEv2 protocol between the UE and no-3GPP access gateway(ePDG) is also used for IP address configuration. The IP address is carried by configuration payload in IKEv2.
From the above analysis, we can see that there is a mandatory IKEv2 protocol running between the UE and the network in 3GPP s2b interface. It is natural to consider extending this protocol to carry the flow mobility control information.
TOC |
IKEv2's configuration payload is defined to carry configuration information, for example: IP address allocation etc. The format of the configration payload is as follows:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! Next Payload !C! RESERVED ! Payload Length ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! CFG Type ! RESERVED ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ! ! ~ Configuration Attributes ~ ! ! +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Format of Configuration Payload of IKEv2 |
As Figure 1 (Format of Configuration Payload of IKEv2) depicted, IKEv2 configuration payload has CFG Type and configuration attributes options. CFG Type includes CFG_REQUEST, CFG_REPLY, CFG_SET, CFG_ACK. "CFG_SET/CFG_ACK" allows an IKE endpoint to push configuration data to its peer. "CFG_REQUEST/ CFG_REPLY" allows an IKE endpoint to request information from its peer.
Configuration attributes has the following format:
1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ !R| Attribute Type ! Length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | ~ Value ~ | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Format of Configuration attributes |
Current specified attribute type include:
Multi- Attribute Type Value Valued Length ======================= ===== ====== ================== RESERVED 0 INTERNAL_IP4_ADDRESS 1 YES* 0 or 4 octets INTERNAL_IP4_NETMASK 2 NO 0 or 4 octets INTERNAL_IP4_DNS 3 YES 0 or 4 octets INTERNAL_IP4_NBNS 4 YES 0 or 4 octets INTERNAL_ADDRESS_EXPIRY 5 NO 0 or 4 octets INTERNAL_IP4_DHCP 6 YES 0 or 4 octets APPLICATION_VERSION 7 NO 0 or more INTERNAL_IP6_ADDRESS 8 YES* 0 or 17 octets RESERVED 9 INTERNAL_IP6_DNS 10 YES 0 or 16 octets INTERNAL_IP6_NBNS 11 YES 0 or 16 octets INTERNAL_IP6_DHCP 12 YES 0 or 16 octets INTERNAL_IP4_SUBNET 13 YES 0 or 8 octets SUPPORTED_ATTRIBUTES 14 NO Multiple of 2 INTERNAL_IP6_SUBNET 15 YES 17 octets
Figure 3: Attribute type |
This document proposes to extend the attribute type of the Configuration attributes , adding two new types: IPv4_FLOW_CONTROL/ IPv6_FLOW_CONTROL, the definition of this proposal is as follows:
Multi- Attribute Type Value Valued Length ======================= ===== ====== ================== IPv4_FLOW_CONTROL 20 YES* 0 or x octets IPv6_FLOW_CONTROL 21 YES* 0 or x octets
Figure 4: Attribute type extension |
The corresponding value of this proposed FLOW_CONTROL attribute is as follows:
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | MN-ID | BID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | HNP | Action | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | start Source Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | End Source Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | start Destination Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | End Destination Address | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Start SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | End SPI | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Start Source port | End Source port | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | start Destination port | End Destination port | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: FLOW_CONTROL Attribute value definition |
TOC |
for flow mobility, MN decides when to initiate flow handover. MN uses the above extended IKEv2 configureation payload extension to send the flow control message. Flow mobility polilcy control function need to communicate with the IKE module in the MN to carry the flow mobility control information.
TOC |
MAG needs to get the flow mobility control information from the IKE configration payload extension. MAG then send PBU message with the flow mobility extension.
TOC |
LMA get flow control information from the PBU which carries the flow mobility extension. Then it control the flow mobility action accordingly.
TOC |
TBD
TOC |
None
TOC |
TOC |
[RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML). |
[RFC3775] | Johnson, D., Perkins, C., and J. Arkko, “Mobility Support in IPv6,” RFC 3775, June 2004 (TXT). |
[RFC5213] | Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., Devarapalli, V., Chowdhury, K., and B. Patil, “Proxy Mobile IPv6,” RFC 5213, August 2008 (TXT). |
TOC |
[I-D.ietf-mext-flow-binding] | Soliman, H., Tsirtsis, G., Montavont, N., Giaretta, G., and K. Kuladinithi, “Flow Bindings in Mobile IPv6 and NEMO Basic Support,” draft-ietf-mext-flow-binding-06 (work in progress), March 2010 (TXT). |
[RFC4306] | Kaufman, C., “Internet Key Exchange (IKEv2) Protocol,” RFC 4306, December 2005 (TXT). |
TOC |
Dapeng Liu | |
China Mobile | |
Unit2, 28 Xuanwumenxi Ave,Xuanwu District | |
Beijing 100053 | |
China | |
Email: | liudapeng@chinamobile.com |
Zhen Cao | |
China Mobile | |
Unit2, 28 Xuanwumenxi Ave,Xuanwu District | |
Beijing 100053 | |
China | |
Email: | caozhen@chinamobile.com |
Bo Zhou | |
China Mobile | |
Unit2, 28 Xuanwumenxi Ave,Xuanwu District | |
Beijing 100053 | |
China | |
Email: | zhouboyj@chinamobile.com |