TOC 
Message Organization Working GroupD. Karp
Internet-DraftZimbra
Updates: 5256 (if approved)June 10, 2008
Intended status: Standards Track 
Expires: December 12, 2008 


Display-based Address Sorting for the IMAP4 SORT Extension
draft-karp-morg-sortdisplay-00

Status of this Memo

By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”

The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.

The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.

This Internet-Draft will expire on December 12, 2008.

Abstract

This document describes an IMAP protocol extension enabling server-side message sorting based on the commonly-displayed portion of the From header.



Table of Contents

1.  Conventions Used in This Document
2.  Introduction
3.  The DISPLAYFROM Sort Key
4.  Formal Syntax
5.  Security Considerations
6.  Internationalization Considerations
7.  IANA Considerations
8.  Normative References
§  Author's Address
§  Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements




 TOC 

1.  Conventions Used in This Document

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).



 TOC 

2.  Introduction

The [SORT] (Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” June 2008.) extension to the [IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) protocol provides a means for server-based sorting of messages. It defines a set of sort criteria and the mechanism for determining the sort value of a message for each such ordering.

The [SORT] (Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” June 2008.) extension's FROM ordering sorts messages lexically on the [IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) addr-part of the first address in the From header. This document provides an alternate ordering, DISPLAYFROM, which sorts messages lexically based on the From address's [RFC2822] (Resnick, P., “Internet Message Format,” April 2001.) display-name, when present.

A server that supports the DISPLAYFROM sort criterion indicates this by returning "SORT=DISPLAYFROM" in its CAPABILITY response.



 TOC 

3.  The DISPLAYFROM Sort Key

This document introduces a new [SORT] (Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” June 2008.) sort-key, DISPLAYFROM.

A message's sort value under the DISPLAYFROM ordering MUST be derived from the first [RFC2822] (Resnick, P., “Internet Message Format,” April 2001.) mailbox in its From header as follows:



 TOC 

4.  Formal Syntax

The following syntax specification uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation as specified in [RFC2234] (Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” November 1997.). [IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) defines the non-terminal "capability" and [SORT] (Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” June 2008.) defines "sort-key".

capability    =/ "SORT=DISPLAYFROM"

sort-key      =/ "DISPLAYFROM"


 TOC 

5.  Security Considerations

This document defines an additional IMAP4 capability. As such, it does not change the underlying security considerations of [IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.). The author believes that no new security issues are introduced with this additional IMAP4 capability.



 TOC 

6.  Internationalization Considerations

DISPLAYFROM is a string-based sort criterion. As stated in [SORT] (Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” June 2008.), the collations mandated by I18NLEVEL=1 or I18NLEVEL=2 from [RFC5255] (Newman, C., Gulbrandsen, A., and A. Melnikov, “Internet Message Access Protocol Internationalization,” June 2008.) MUST be followed when sorting such strings.

The DISPLAYFROM ordering sorts on the full decoded [RFC2822] (Resnick, P., “Internet Message Format,” April 2001.) display-name, when present. It does not attempt to parse this string in a locale- or language-dependent manner in order to determine and sort on some semantically meaningful substring such as the surname.



 TOC 

7.  IANA Considerations

[IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) capabilities are registered by publishing a standards track or IESG-approved experimental RFC. This document constitutes registration of the SORT=DISPLAYFROM capability in the [IMAP] (Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” March 2003.) capabilities registry.



 TOC 

8. Normative References

[IMAP] Crispin, M., “INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1,” RFC 3501, March 2003 (TXT).
[RFC2047] Moore, K., “MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) Part Three: Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text,” RFC 2047, November 1996 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC2234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” RFC 2234, November 1997 (TXT, HTML, XML).
[RFC2822] Resnick, P., “Internet Message Format,” RFC 2822, April 2001 (TXT).
[RFC5255] Newman, C., Gulbrandsen, A., and A. Melnikov, “Internet Message Access Protocol Internationalization,” RFC 5255, June 2008 (TXT).
[SORT] Crispin, M. and K. Murchison, “Internet Message Access Protocol - SORT and THREAD Extensions,” RFC 5256, June 2008 (TXT).


 TOC 

Author's Address

  Dan Karp
  Zimbra, a Yahoo! Company
  701 First St.
  Sunnyvale, CA 94089
  USA
Email:  dkarp@zimbra.com
URI:  http://www.zimbra.com


 TOC 

Full Copyright Statement

Intellectual Property