| Internet-Draft | Vehicular Neighbor Discovery | February 2024 |
| Jeong, et al. | Expires 11 August 2024 | [Page] |
This document specifies a Vehicular Neighbor Discovery (VND) as an extension of IPv6 Neighbor Discovery (ND) for IP-based vehicular networks. An optimized Address Registration and a multihop Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) mechanism are performed for having operation efficiency and also saving both wireless bandwidth and vehicle energy. In addition, three new ND options for prefix discovery, service discovery, and mobility information report are defined to announce the network prefixes and services inside a vehicle (i.e., a vehicle's internal network).¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 11 August 2024.¶
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET) have been researched for Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) such as driving safety, efficient driving and entertainment. Considering the high-speed mobility of vehicular network based on Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) [DSRC-WAVE], IEEE has standardized IEEE 802.11p [IEEE-802.11p] as a MAC protocol for vehicles in Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE). IEEE 802.11p was renamed IEEE 802.11 Outside the Context of a Basic Service Set (OCB) [IEEE-802.11-OCB]. In addition, IEEE has also standardized a family standard suite of WAVE as IEEE 1609. This IEEE 1609 standard suite is considered as a key component for ITS. IEEE 1609 standards include IEEE 1609.0 [WAVE-1609.0], 1609.2 [WAVE-1609.2], 1609.3 [WAVE-1609.3], and 1609.4 [WAVE-1609.4], which provide a low-latency and alternative network for vehicular communications. What is more, IP-based vehicular networks specialized as IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (IPWAVE) [RFC9365] can enable many use cases over vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I), and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications. IETF has standardized an IPv6 packet delivery protocol over IEEE 802.11-OCB [RFC8691].¶
VANET features high mobility dynamics, asymmetric and lossy connections, and moderate power constraint (e.g., electric cars and unmanned aerial vehicles). Links among hosts and routers in VANET can be considered as undetermined connectivities with constantly changing neighbors described in [RFC5889]. IPv6 [RFC8200] is selected as the network-layer protocol for Internet applications by IEEE 1609.0 and 1609.3. However, the relative long-time Neighbor Discovery (ND) process in IPv6 [RFC4861] is not suitable in VANET scenarios.¶
To better support the interaction between vehicles or between vehicles and Rode-Side Units (RSUs), this document specifies a Vehicular Neighbor Discovery (VND) procedure as an extension of IPv6 ND for IP-based vehicular networks. VND provides vehicles with an optimized Address Registration and a multihop Duplicate Address Detection (DAD) mechanism. In addition, an efficient mobility management scheme is specified to support efficient V2V, V2I, and V2X communications. Detailed statements of the mobility management are addressed in [I-D.jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management] .¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].¶
This document uses the terminology described in [RFC4861], [RFC4862], [RFC6775], and [RFC8691]. In addition, the following new terms are defined as below:¶
WAVE: Acronym for "Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments" [WAVE-1609.0].¶
Mobility Anchor (MA): A node that maintains IP addresses and mobility information of vehicles in a road network to support the address autoconfiguration and mobility management of them. It has end-to-end connections with RSUs under its control. It maintains a DAD Table recording the IP addresses of vehicles moving within the communication coverage of its RSUs.¶
Vehicular Cloud: A cloud infrastructure for vehicular networks, including compute nodes, storage nodes, and network nodes.¶
Traffic Control Center (TCC): A node that maintains road infrastructure information (e.g., RSUs, traffic signals, and loop detectors), vehicular traffic statistics (e.g., average vehicle speed and vehicle inter-arrival time per road segment), and vehicle information (e.g., a vehicle's identifier, position, direction, speed, and trajectory as a navigation path). TCC is included in a vehicular cloud for vehicular networks and has MAs under its management.¶
This document proposes an optimized ND with a more adaptive structure for vehicular networks compared to [RFC4861] by considering dynamic vehicle mobility and overhead of control message traffic in wireless environments. Furthermore, prefix and service discovery can be implemented as part of the ND's process along with an efficient Address Registration procedure and a DAD mechanism for moving vehicles. This document specifies a set of behaviors between vehicles and RSUs to accomplish these goals.¶
There is a relationship between a link and a network prefix along with reachability scopes, such as link-local and global scopes. The legacy IPv6 ND protocol [RFC4861] has the following link model. All IPv6 nodes in the same on-link subnet, which use the same subnet prefix with the on-link bit set, are reachable with each other by one-hop links. The symmetry of the connectivity among the nodes is assumed, that is, bidirectional connectivity between two on-link nodes. However, a link model in vehicular networks (called vehicular link model) should consider the asymmetry of the connectivity that unidirectional links can exist due to interference in wireless channels and the different levels of transmission power employed by wireless network interfaces.¶
The on-link subnet can be constructed by one link (as a basic service set) or multiple links (as an extended service set) called a multi-link subnet [RFC6775]. In this multi-link subnet, an all-node-multicasted packet is copied and related to other links by an ND proxy. On the other hand, in vehicular networks having fast moving vehicles, multiple links can share the same subnet prefix for operation efficiency. For example, if two wireless links under two adjacent RSUs are in the same subnet, a vehicle as an IPv6 host does not need to reconfigure its IPv6 address during handover between those RSUs. However, the packet relay by an RSU as an ND proxy is not required because such a relay can cause a broadcast storm in the extended subnet. Thus, in the multi-link subnet, all-node-multicasting needs to be well-calibrated to either being confined to multicasting in the current link or being disseminated to other links in the same subnet.¶
In a connected multihop VANET, for efficient communication, vehicles in the same link of an RSU can communicate directly with each other, not through the serving RSU. This direct wireless communication is similar to the direct wired communication in an on-link subnet using Ethernet as a wired network. The vehicular link model needs to accommodate both the ad-hoc communication between vehicles and infrastructure communication between a vehicle and an RSU in an efficient and flexible way. Therefore, the IPv6 ND should be extended to accommodate the concept of a new IPv6 link model in vehicular networks.¶
To support multi-link subnet, this specification employs the Shared-Prefix model for prefix assignments. A Shared-Prefix model refers to an addressing model where the prefix(es) are shared by more than one node. In this document, we assume that in a specified subnet, all interfaces of RSUs responding for prefix assignments to vehicles hold the same prefix, which ensure vehicles obtain and maintain the same prefix in this subnet scope.¶
This document takes advantage of the optimized ND for Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) [RFC6775] because vehicular environments have common parts with 6LoWPAN, such as the reduction of unnecessary wireless traffic by multicasting and the energy saving in battery. Note that vehicles tend to be electric vehicles whose energy source is from their battery.¶
In the optimized IPv6 ND for 6LoWPAN, the connections among nodes are assumed to be asymmetric and unidirectional because of changing radio environment and loss signal. The authors proposed an optimized IPv6 ND which greatly eliminates link-scope multicast to save energy by constructing new options and a new scheme for address configurations. Similarly, this document proposes an improved IPv6 ND by eliminating many link-scope-multicast-based ND operations, such as DAD for IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration (SLAAC) [RFC4862]. Thus, this document suggests an extension of IPv6 ND as vehicular ND tailored for vehicular networks along with new ND options (e.g., prefix discovery, service discovery, and mobility information options).¶
The vehicular ND in this document has the following design goals:¶
To perform prefix and service discovery through ND procedure;¶
To implement host-initiated refresh of Router Advertisement (RA) and remove the necessity for routers to use periodic or unsolicited multicast RA to find hosts;¶
To replace Neighbor Unreachable Detection(NUD) and create Neighbor Cache Entries (NCE) for all registered vehicles in RSUs and MA by appending Address Registration Option (ARO) in Neighbor Solicitation (NS) and Neighbor Advertisement (NA) messages;¶
To support a multihop DAD by conveying ND messages received from vehicles to MA to eliminate multicast storms and save energy; and¶
To support multihop communication for vehicles outside the coverage of RSUs to communicate with the serving RSU via a relay neighbor.¶
A vehicular network architecture for V2I and V2V is illustrated in Figure 1. Three RSUs are deployed along roadsides and are connected to an MA through wired links. There are two subnets such as Subnet1 and Subnet2. The wireless links of RSU1 and RSU2 belong to the same subnet named Subnet1, but the wireless link of RSU3 belongs to another subnet named Subnet2. Vehicle2 is wirelessly connected to RSU1 while Vehicle3 and Vehicle4 are connected to RSU2 and RSU3, respectively. Vehicles can directly communicate with each other through V2V connection (e.g., Vehicle1 and Vehicle2) to share driving information. In addition, vehicles not in the range of any RSU may connect with RSU in multihop connection via relay vehicle (e.g., Vehicle1 can contact RSU1 via Vehicle2). Vehicles are assumed to start the connection to an RSU when they entered the coverage of the RSU.¶
This document recommends a multi-link subnet involving multiple RSUs as shown in Figure 1. This recommendation aims at the reduction of the frequency with which vehicles have to change their IP address during handover between two adjacent RSUs. To construct this multi-link subnet, a Shared-Prefix model is proposed. That is, for RSUs in the same subnet, the interfaces responsible for prefix assignment for vehicles should hold the same prefix in their global address. This also promises vehicles achieve the same prefix in this scope. When they pass through RSUs in the same subnet, vehicles do not need to perform the Address Registration and DAD again because they can use their current IP address in the wireless coverage of the next RSU. Moreover, this proposal accords with the assumption that nodes belonging to the same IP prefix domain are able to communicate with each other directly without the intervention of RSUs if they are within the wireless communication range of each other. On the other hand, if vehicles enter the wireless coverage of an RSU belonging to another subnet with a different prefix, they repeat the Address Registration and DAD procedure to update their IP address with the new prefix.¶
In Figure 1, RSU1 and RSU2 are deployed in a multi-link subnet with the same prefix address in their interfaces responding for connection with vehicles. When vehicle2 leaves the coverage of RSU1 and enters RSU2, it maintains its address configuration and ignores Address Registration and DAD steps. If vehicle2 moves into the coverage of RSU3, since RSU3 belongs to another subnet and holds a different prefix from RSU1 and RSU2, so vehicle2 must do Address Registration and DAD just as connecting to a new RSU. Note that vehicles and RSUs have their internal networks including in-vehicle devices and servers, respectively. The structures of the internal networks are described in [RFC9365].¶
Traffic Control Center in Vehicular Cloud
*-----------------------------------------*
* *
* +----------------+ *
* | Mobility Anchor| *
* +----------------+ *
* ^ *
* | *
*------------------v----------------------*
^ ^ ^
| | |
| | |
v v v
+--------+ Ethernet +--------+ +--------+
| RSU1 |<-------->| RSU2 |<---------->| RSU3 |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+
^ ^ ^
: : :
+-------------------------------------+ +-----------------+
| : V2I V2I : | | V2I : |
| v v | | v |
+--------+ | +--------+ +--------+ | | +--------+ |
|Vehicle1|===> |Vehicle2|===> |Vehicle3|===>| | |Vehicle4|===>|
| |<...>| |<........>| | | | | | |
+--------+ V2V +--------+ V2V +--------+ | | +--------+ |
| | | |
+-------------------------------------+ +-----------------+
Subnet1 Subnet2
<----> Wired Link <....> Wireless Link ===> Moving Direction
This section specifies an IPv6 ND extension for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) or vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) networking. This section also defines three new ND options for prefix discovery, service discovery, and mobility information report: (i) Vehicular Prefix Information (VPI) option, (ii) Vehicular Service Information (VSI) option, and (iii) Vehicular Mobility Information (VMI) option. It also describes the procedure of the ND protocol with those options.¶
The VPI option contains IPv6 prefix information in the internal network. Figure 2 shows the format of the VPI option.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Prefix Length | Distance | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | : Prefix : | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Fields:
Type 8-bit identifier of the VPI option type as assigned
by the IANA: TBD
Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option
(including the Type and Length fields) is in units of
8 octets. The value is 3.
Prefix Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The number of leading bits
in the Prefix that are valid. The value ranges
from 0 to 128.
Distance 8-bit unsigned integer. The distance between the
subnet announcing this prefix and the subnet
corresponding to this prefix in terms of the number
of hops.
Reserved This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to
zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Prefix An IP address or a prefix of an IP address. The
Prefix Length field contains the number of valid
leading bits in the prefix. The bits in the prefix
after the prefix length are reserved and MUST be
initialized to zero by the sender and ignored by
the receiver.
¶
The VSI option contains vehicular service information in the internal network. Figure 3 shows the format of the VSI option.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Reserved1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Protocol | Reserved2 | Port Number | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | : Node Address : | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Fields:
Type 8-bit identifier of the VSI option type as assigned
by the IANA: TBD
Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option
(including the Type and Length fields) is in units of
8 octets. The value is 3.
Reserved1 This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to
zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Protocol 8-bit unsigned integer to indicate the upper-layer
protocol, such as transport-layer protocol (e.g.,
TCP, UDP, and SCTP).
Reserved2 This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to
zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Port Number 16-bit unsigned integer to indicate the port number
for this protocol.
Service Address
128-bit IPv6 address of a node providing this vehicular
service.
¶
The VMI option contains one vehicular mobility information of a vehicle or an RSU. Figure 4 shows the format of the VMI option.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Type | Length | Reserved1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Reserved2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | : Mobility Information : | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Fields:
Type 8-bit identifier of the VMI option type as assigned
by the IANA: TBD
Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The length of the option
(including the Type and Length fields) is in units of
8 octets. The value is 3.
Reserved1 This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to
zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Reserved2 This field is unused. It MUST be initialized to
zero by the sender and MUST be ignored by the
receiver.
Mobility Information
128-bit mobility information, such as position,
speed, acceleration/deceleration, and direction.
¶
Prefix discovery enables hosts (e.g., vehicles and in-vehicle devices) to distinguish destinations on the same link from those only reachable via RSUs. A vehicle (or its in-vehicle devices) can directly communicate with on-link vehicles (or their in-vehicle devices) without the relay of an RSU, but through V2V communications along with VPI ND option. This VPI option contains IPv6 prefixes in a vehicle's internal network.¶
Vehicles announce services in their internal networks to other vehicles through an VSI ND option. The VSI option contains a list of vehicular services in a vehicle's or an RSU's internal network.¶
A vehicle periodically announces an NS message containing VPI and VSI options with its prefixes and services in all-nodes multicast address to reach all neighboring nodes. When it receives this NS message, another neighboring node responds to this NS message by sending an NA message containing the VPI and VSI options with its prefixes and services via unicast towards the NS-originating node.¶
Therefore, prefix and service discovery can be achieved via ND messages (e.g., NS and NA) by vehicular ND with VPI and VSI options. This VND-based discovery eliminates an additional prefix and service discovery scheme, such as DNS-based Service Discovery [RFC6763] (e.g., Multicast DNS (mDNS) [RFC6762] and DNSNA [I-D.jeong-ipwave-iot-dns-autoconf]), other than ND. That is, vehicles and RSUs can rapidly discover the network prefixes and services of the other party without any additional service discovery protocol.¶
This subsection explains a message exchange procedure for VND in V2I networking, where a vehicle communicates with its correspondent node in the Internet via an RSU.¶
Figure 5 shows an example of message exchange procedure in V2I networking. Detailed steps of the procedure are explained in Section 7. The mobility management part is described in [I-D.jeong-ipwave-vehicular-mobility-management].¶
Note that a vehicle could also perform the prefix and service discovery simultaneously along with Address Registration procedure, as shown in Figure 7.¶
This document specified that RSUs as routers do not transmit periodical and unsolicited multicast RA messages including a prefix for energy saving in vehicular networks. Vehicles as hosts periodically initiate an RS message according to a time interval (considering its position and an RSU's coverage). Since they have a digital road map with the information of RSUs (e.g., position and communication coverage), vehicles can know when they will go out of the communication range of an RSU along with the signal strength (e.g., Received Channel Power Indicator (RCPI) [VIP-WAVE]) from the RSU. RSUs replies with a solicited RA in unicast only when they receive an RS message.¶
Vehicle RSU MA
| | |
|-RS with Mobility Info->| |
| [VMI] | |
| | |
| |-----------PBU--------->|
| | |
| | |
| |<----------PBA----------|
| | |
| | |
| |======Bi-Dir Tunnel=====|
| | |
| | |
|<----RA with prefix-----| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|--NS with Address Reg-->| |
| [ARO+VPI+VSI] | |
| | |
| |---Forward NS for DAD-->|
| | |
| | |
| |<--NA with DAD result---|
| | [ARO+VPI+VSI] |
|<------Forward NA-------| |
| | |
This section explains address configuration, consisting of IP Address Autoconfiguration, Address Registration, and multihop DAD via V2I or V2V.¶
This document recommends a new Address Registration and DAD scheme in order to avoid multicast flooding and decrease link-scope multicast for energy and wireless channel conservation on a large-scale vehicular network. Host-initiated refresh of RA removes the necessity for routers to use frequent and unsolicited multicast RAs to accommodate hosts. This also enables the same IPv6 address prefix(es) to be used across a subnet.¶
There are three scenarios feasible in Address Registration scheme:¶
Vehicle enters the subnet for the first time or the current RSU belongs to another subnet: Vehicles need to perform the Address Registration and multihop DAD as described in the following subsections.¶
Vehicle has already configured its IP addresses with prefix obtained from the previous RSU, and the current RSU located in the same subnet: This means RSUs have the same prefix and the vehicle has no need to repeat the Address Registration and multihop DAD.¶
Vehicle is not in the coverage of RSU but has a neighbor registered in RSU: This document proposes a new V2V scenario for vehicles which are currently not in the range of the RSU. If a user vehicle failed to find an on-link RSU, it starts to look for adjacent vehicle neighbors which can work as a relay neighbor to share the prefix obtained from RSU and undertake DAD of the user vehicle by forwarding DAD messages to RSU.¶
A vehicle as an IPv6 host creates its link-local IPv6 address and global IPv6 address as follows [RFC4862]. When they receive RS messages from vehicles, RSUs send back RA messages containing prefix information. The vehicle makes its global IPv6 addresses by combining the prefix for its current link and its link-layer address.¶
The address autoconfiguration does not perform the legacy DAD as defined in [RFC4862]. Instead, a new multihop DAD is performed in Section 7.3.¶
After its IP tentative address autoconfiguration with the known prefix from an RSU and its link-layer address, a vehicle starts to register its IP address to the serving RSU along with multihop DAD. Address Registration Option (ARO) is used in this step and its format is defined in [RFC6775].¶
ARO is always host-initiated by vehicles. Information such as registration time and registration status contained in ARO are applied to indicate the registration duration and result. ARO will also be forwarded to MA together with NS by RSUs.¶
An example message exchange procedure of Address Registration is presented in Figure 6. Since Address Registration is performed simultaneously with the multihop DAD, the specific procedure is together described with the DAD mechanism in Section 7.3.¶
Vehicle RSU
| |
| |
1. |----NS with Address Reg--->|
| [ARO] |
| |
| |
| |
2. |<---NA with Address Reg----|
| [ARO] |
Before it can exchange data, a node should determine whether its IP address is already used by another node or not. In the legacy IPv6 ND, hosts multicast NS messages to all nodes in the same on-link subnet for DAD. Instead of this, an optimized multihop DAD is designed to eliminate multicast messages for energy-saving purpose. For this multihop DAD, Neighbor Cache and DAD Table are maintained by each RSU and an MA, respectively, for the duplicate address inspection during the multihop DAD process. That is, each RSU makes Neighbor Cache Entries (NCE) of all the on-link hosts in its Neighbor Cache. Similarly, the MA stores all the NCEs reported by the RSUs in its DAD Table.¶
With the multihop DAD, a vehicle can skip the multicast-based DAD in its current wireless link whenever it enters the coverage of another RSU in the same subset, leading to the reduction of traffic overhead in vehicular wireless links.¶
For the multihop DAD, we take advantage of the procedure of [RFC6775] but simplified the message flows by canceling the two new ICMPv6 message types such as Duplicate Address Request (DAR) and the Duplicate Address Confirmation (DAC). Instead, NS and NA containing ARO are directly forwarded between RSU and MA. This idea is raised because DAR and DAC¶
Figure 7 presents the procedure of Address Registration and multihop DAD. The detailed steps are explained as follows.¶
Vehicle RSU MA
| | |
| | |
1. |--NS with Address Reg-->| |
| [ARO+VPI+VSI] | |
| | |
2. | |----Forward NS--->|
| | |
| | |
3. | |<---Forward NA----|
| | |
| | |
4. |<--NA with Address Reg--| |
| [ARO+VPI+VSI] | |
A vehicle sends an NS message to the current RSU in unicast, containing the ARO to register its address.¶
The RSU receives the NS message, and then inspects its Neighbor Cache to check whether it is duplicate or not. If there is no duplicate NCE, a tentative NCE is created for this address, and then the RSU forward the NS message containing the ARO to the MA for the multihop DAD.¶
When the MA receives NS from an RSU, it checks whether the register-requested address exists in its DAD Table or not. If an entry with the same address exists in the DAD Table, which means that the address is considered "Duplicate Address", then MA returns a NA message containing the registration status in ARO to notify the RSU of the address duplication. If no entry with the same address exists in the DAD Table, which means that an entry for the address is created, then MA replies a NA message to the RSU to confirm the uniqueness of the register-requested address to the RSU.¶
If the address duplication is notified by the MA, the RSU deletes the tentative NCE, and forward NA with to the address-registration vehicle to notify the registration failure. Otherwise, the RSU changes the tentative NCE into a registered NCE in its Neighbor Cache, and then forward NA to the vehicle to notify the registration success.¶
Thus, the multihop DAD is processed simultaneously with the Address Registration. Note that the tentative address is not considered assigned to the vehicle until the MA confirms the uniqueness of the register-requested address in the multihop DAD.¶
If a vehicle failed to register a default router, it triggers neighbor discovery to look for vehicle neighbors which can provide relay service using multihop communication. In this specification, we assumed vehicles would not emulate V2V communication and trigger relay scenario only if Router Discovery(RD) failed.¶
User Vehicle Relay Vehicle RSU MA | | | | |------------------------| | | | RD failed | | | |------------------------| | | | | | | | | | | |-----------NS---------->| | | | | | | |<--NA with Prefix Info--| | | | | | | | | | | |--NS with Address Reg-->| | | | [ARO+VPI+VSI] | | | | |----- Forward NS ----->| | | | | | | | |-----------------| | | | Same as Figure 9| | | |-----------------| | | | | | |<--NA with Address Reg-| | | | [ARO+VPI+VSI] | | |<------ Forward NA -----| | | | | | |
Since vehicles have a digital road map with the information of RSUs (e.g., position and communication coverage), they can determine if they are available to serve as a relay vehicle. Only vehicles with the ability to serve as temporary relays will take action when they receive relay service requests. The user vehicle can process global address configuration, Address Registration and DAD through its relay vehicle before it enters the coverage of RSUs. See Figure 8.¶
When a user vehicle failed to directly register to an RSU, it initiates neighbor discovery to detect vehicle neighbors through V2V communication. Vehicle sends NS messages to connect with neighbors in range. If neighbor can provide relay service, it creates a NCE for user vehicle, setting its own address as relay address, and sends back NA with prefix information received from RSU.¶
To guarantee vehicles could find the nearest neighbor from multiple neighbors which can act as relay vehicles, a new time-out mechanism is presented to select the nearest neighbor by hop distance parameter carried in Prefix Information Option. That is, a user vehicle multicast NS messages to look for relay vehicles after RD failed and wait for 1.5 seconds to receive all NA replies from neighbors. Each NA carries its own global prefix(es) and the hop distance(s) in Prefix Information Option. The user vehicle preserves every NA reply in a temporary router list and select the one with least hop counts as its relay vehicle after time out.¶
With receipt of NA, user vehicle configures its global address with prefix information as mentioned in Section 7.1. After this, user vehicle takes up to initiate the Address Registration along with DAD process via relay vehicle. NS message is configured as specified in Section 7.2 but indicate the relay vehicle's address as next-hop to reach the RSU. In such a case, when relay vehicle receives relay request message, it will forward NS message to RSU. The procedure sets up on the rails except MA will include the relay vehicle's address as relay address in NCE to indicate that at this moment, it is not a directly attached vehicle, and sets the relay address as next-hop address. Relay vehicle forwards DAD result information message to user vehicle as soon as it received.¶
This document supports multihop communications (e.g., multihop DAD and UDP/TCP transmission) for remote vehicles through multiple relay vehicles. Vehicles which have already finished DAD process can serve as temporary routers and forward packets for remote vehicles.¶
A new routing mechanism is specified to accomplish route selections among user vehicles and serving RSUs when multiple vehicles act as relay vehicles. Taking advantage of the Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing protocol (DSDV) [DSDV], this new routing approach supposes that each vehicle holds a Neighbor Routing Table which integrates the neighbor information in Neighbor Cache and forwarding records for remote vehicles. Each vehicle which acts as a relay vehicle for this remote vehicle will make records in its Neighbor Routing Table.¶
Figure 9 specifies an example of parameters in Neighbor Routing Table when more than one vehicle work as intermediate relay vehicles. In Figure 9, Vehicle3 connects RSU1 indirectly via Vehicle2 and Vehicle1. When Vehicle1 and Vehicle2 forward messages for Vehicle3, they make records in its Neighbor Routing Table including the next-hop node to indicate the route to Vehicle3. This can ensure that the packets from a source vehicle can be successfully transmitted to an RSU as well as the reverse packet path exists from the RSU to the source vehicle.¶
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
|Vehicle3|<......>|Vehicle2|<........>|Vehicle1|<.......> | RSU1 |
| (V3) | V2V | (V2) | V2V | (V1) | V2I | |
+--------+ +--------+ +--------+ +--------+
+------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
|Node|NextHop| |Node|NextHop| |Node|NextHop| |Node|NextHop|
+------------+ +------------+ +------------+ +------------+
| V2 | V2 | | V1 | V1 | |RSU1| RSU1 | | V1 | V1 |
+------------+ | V3 | V3 | | V2 | V2 | | V2 | V1 |
+------------+ | V3 | V2 | | V3 | V1 |
+------------+ +------------+
Considering the privacy protection of a vehicle, a pseudonym mechanism for its link-layer address is requested. This mechanism periodically modifies the link-layer address, leading to the update of the corresponding IP address. A random MAC Address Generation mechanism is proposed in Appendix F.4 of [IEEE-802.11-OCB] by generating the 46 remaining bits of MAC address using a random number generator. When it changes its MAC address, a vehicle should ask the serving RSU to update its own NCE, and to register its IP address into the MA again.¶
This document shares all the security issues of the neighbor discovery protocol and 6LoWPAN protocol. This document can get benefits from secure neighbor discovery (SEND) [RFC3971] in order to protect ND from possible security attacks.¶
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (No. 2023R1A2C2002990).¶
This work was supported in part by Institute of Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT)(No. 2022-0-01015, Development of Candidate Element Technology for Intelligent 6G Mobile Core Network).¶
This document is made by the group effort of IPWAVE working group. Many people actively contributed to this document, such as Carlos J. Bernardos and Russ Housley. The authors sincerely appreciate their contributions.¶
The following are co-authors of this document:¶
Bien Aime Mugabarigira - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea. EMail: bienaime@skku.edu¶
Zhong Xiang - Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea. EMail: xz618@skku.edu¶
Junhee Kwon - Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro Jangan-gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16419, Republic of Korea. EMail: juun9714@skku.edu¶
The following changes are made from draft-jeong-ipwave-vehicular-neighbor-discovery-16:¶
This version updates the version number.¶