| TOC |
|
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on June 7, 2009.
This document defines the conceptual state machines for the Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA). The state machines consist of the PANA Client (PaC) state machine and the PANA Authentication Agent (PAA) state machine. The two state machines show how PANA can interface with the EAP state machines. The state machines and associated model are informative only. Implementations may achieve the same results using different methods.
1.
Introduction
2.
Terminology
3.
Interface Between PANA and EAP
4.
Document Authority
5.
Notations
6.
Common Rules
6.1.
Common Procedures
6.2.
Common Variables
6.3.
Constants
6.4.
Common Message Initialization Rules
6.5.
Common Retransmition Rules
6.6.
Common State Transitions
7.
PaC State Machine
7.1.
Interface between PaC and EAP Peer
7.1.1.
Delivering EAP Messages from PaC to EAP Peer
7.1.2.
Delivering EAP Messages from EAP Peer to PaC
7.1.3.
EAP Restart Notification from PaC to EAP Peer
7.1.4.
EAP Authentication Result Notification from EAP Peer to PaC
7.1.5.
Alternate Failure Notification from PaC to EAP Peer
7.2.
Constants
7.3.
Variables
7.4.
Procedures
7.5.
PaC State Transition Table
8.
PAA State Machine
8.1.
Interface between PAA and EAP Authenticator
8.1.1.
EAP Restart Notification from PAA to EAP Authenticator
8.1.2.
Delivering EAP Responses from PAA to EAP Authenticator
8.1.3.
Delivering EAP Messages from EAP Authenticator to PAA
8.1.4.
EAP Authentication Result Notification from EAP Authenticator to PAA
8.2.
Variables
8.3.
Procedures
8.4.
PAA State Transition Table
9.
Implementation Considerations
9.1.
PAA and PaC Interface to Service Management Entity
10.
Security Considerations
11.
IANA Considerations
12.
Acknowledgments
13.
References
13.1.
Normative References
13.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
§
Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements
| TOC |
This document defines the state machines for Protocol Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA) [RFC5191] (Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A. Yegin, “Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA),” May 2008.). There are state machines for the PANA client (PaC) and for the PANA Authentication Agent (PAA). Each state machine is specified through a set of variables, procedures and a state transition table.
A PANA protocol execution consists of several exchanges to carry authentication information. Specifically, EAP PDUs are transported inside PANA PDUs between PaC and PAA, that is PANA represents a lower layer for EAP protocol. Thus, a PANA state machine bases its execution on an EAP state machine execution and vice versa. Thus this document also shows for each of PaC and PAA an interface between an EAP state machine and a PANA state machine and how this interface allows to exchange information between them. Thanks to this interface, a PANA state machine can be informed about several events generated in an EAP state machine and make its execution conditional to its events.
The details of EAP state machines are out of the scope of this document. Additional information can be found in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.). Nevertheless PANA state machines presented here have been coordinated with state machines shown by [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.).
This document, apart from defining PaC and PAA state machines and their interfaces to EAP state machines (running on top of PANA), provides some implementation considerations, taking into account that it is not a specification but an implementation guideline.
| TOC |
This document reuses the terminology used in [RFC5191] (Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A. Yegin, “Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA),” May 2008.).
| TOC |
PANA carries EAP messages exchanged between an EAP peer and an EAP authenticator (see Figure 1 (Interface between PANA and EAP)). Thus a PANA state machine interacts with an EAP state machine.
Two state machines are defined in this document : the PaC state machine (see Section 7 (PaC State Machine)) and the PAA state machine (see Section 8 (PAA State Machine)). The definition of each state machine consists of a set of variables, procedures and a state transition table. A subset of these variables and procedures defines the interface between a PANA state machine and an EAP state machine and the state transition table defines the PANA state machine behavior based on results obtained through them.
On the one hand, the PaC state machine interacts with an EAP peer state machine in order to carry out the PANA protocol on the PaC side. On the other hand, the PAA state machine interacts with an EAP authenticator state machine to run the PANA protocol on the PAA side.
Peer |EAP Auth
EAP <---------|------------> EAP
^ | | ^ |
| | | EAP-Message | | EAP-Message
EAP-Message | |EAP-Message | | |
| v |PANA | v
PaC <---------|------------> PAA
| Figure 1: Interface between PANA and EAP |
Thus two interfaces are needed between PANA state machines and EAP state machines, namely:
In general, the PaC and PAA state machines present EAP messages to the EAP peer and authenticator state machines through the interface, respectively. The EAP peer and authenticator state machines process these messages and sends EAP messages through the PaC and PAA state machines that is responsible for actually transmitting this message, respectively.
For example, [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) specifies four interfaces to lower layers: (i) an interface between the EAP peer state machine and a lower layer, (ii) an interface between the EAP standalone authenticator state machine and a lower layer, (iii) an interface between the EAP full authenticator state machine and a lower layer and (iv) an interface between the EAP backend authenticator state machine and a lower layer. In this document, the PANA protocol is the lower layer of EAP and only the first three interfaces are of interest to PANA. The second and third interfaces are the same. In this regard, the EAP standalone authenticator or the EAP full authenticator and its state machine in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) are referred to as the EAP authenticator and the EAP authenticator state machine, respectively, in this document. If an EAP peer and an EAP authenticator follow the state machines defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), the interfaces between PANA and EAP could be based on that document. Detailed definition of interfaces between PANA and EAP are described in the subsequent sections.
| TOC |
When a discrepancy occurs between any part of this document and any of the related documents ([RFC5191] (Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A. Yegin, “Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA),” May 2008.), [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) the latter (the other documents) are considered authoritative and takes precedence.
| TOC |
The following state transition tables are completed mostly based on the conventions specified in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.). The complete text is described below.
State transition tables are used to represent the operation of the protocol by a number of cooperating state machines each comprising a group of connected, mutually exclusive states. Only one state of each machine can be active at any given time.
All permissible transitions from a given state to other states and associated actions performed when the transitions occur are represented by using triplets of (exit condition, exit action, exit state). All conditions are expressions that evaluate to TRUE or FALSE; if a condition evaluates to TRUE, then the condition is met. A state "ANY" is a wildcard state that matches the current state in each state machine. The exit conditions of a wildcard state are evaluated after all other exit conditions of specific to the current state are met.
On exit from a state, the exit actions defined for the state and the exit condition are executed exactly once, in the order that they appear on the page. (Note that the procedures defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) are executed on entry to a state, which is one major difference from this document.) Each exit action is deemed to be atomic; i.e., execution of an exit action completes before the next sequential exit action starts to execute. No exit action execute outside of a state block. The exit actions in only one state block execute at a time even if the conditions for execution of state blocks in different state machines are satisfied. All exit actions in an executing state block complete execution before the transition to and execution of any other state blocks. The execution of any state block appears to be atomic with respect to the execution of any other state block and the transition condition to that state from the previous state is TRUE when execution commences. The order of execution of state blocks in different state machines is undefined except as constrained by their transition conditions. A variable that is set to a particular value in a state block retains this value until a subsequent state block executes an exit action that modifies the value.
On completion of the transition from the previous state to the current state, all exit conditions occurring during the current state (including exit conditions defined for the wildcard state) are evaluated until an exit condition for that state is met.
Any event variable is set to TRUE when the corresponding event occurs and set to FALSE immediately after completion of the action associated with the current state and the event.
The interpretation of the special symbols and operators used is defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.).
| TOC |
There are following procedures, variables, message initializing rules and state transitions that are common to both the PaC and PAA state machines.
Throughout this document, the character string "PANA_MESSAGE_NAME" matches any one of the abbreviated PANA message names, i.e., "PCI", "PAR", "PAN", "PTR", "PTA", "PNR", "PNA".
| TOC |
- void None()
A null procedure, i.e., nothing is done.- void Disconnect()
A procedure to delete the PANA session as well as the corresponding EAP session and authorization state.- boolean Authorize()
A procedure to create or modify authorization state. It returns TRUE if authorization is successful. Otherwise, it returns FALSE. It is assumed that Authorize() procedure of PaC state machine always returns TRUE. In the case that a non-key-generating EAP method is used but a PANA SA is required after successful authentication (generate_pana_sa() returns TRUE), Authorize() procedure must return FALSE.- void Tx:PANA_MESSAGE_NAME[flag](AVPs)
A procedure to send a PANA message to its peering PANA entity. The "flag" argument contains a flag (e.g., Tx:PAR[C]) to be set to the message, except for 'R' (Request) flag. The "AVPs" contains a list of names of optional AVPs to be inserted in the message, except for AUTH AVP.
This procedure includes the following action before actual transmission:
if (flag==S) PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.S_flag=Set; if (flag==C) PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.C_flag=Set; if (flag==A) PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.A_flag=Set; if (flag==P) PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.P_flag=Set; PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.insert_avp(AVPs); if (key_available()) PANA_MESSAGE_NANE.insert_avp("AUTH");- void TxEAP()
A procedure to send an EAP message to the EAP state machine it interfaces to.- void RtxTimerStart()
A procedure to start the retransmission timer, reset RTX_COUNTER variable to zero and set an appropriate value to RTX_MAX_NUM variable.- void RtxTimerStop()
A procedure to stop the retransmission timer.- void SessionTimerReStart(TIMEOUT)
A procedure to (re)start PANA session timer. TIMEOUT specifies the expiration time associated of the session timer. Expiration of TIMEOUT will trigger a SESS_TIMEOUT event.- void SessionTimerStop()
A procedure to stop the current PANA session timer.- void Retransmit()
A procedure to retransmit a PANA message and increment RTX_COUNTER by one(1).- void EAP_Restart()
A procedure to (re)start an EAP conversation resulting in the re-initialization of an existing EAP session.- void PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.insert_avp("AVP_NAME1", "AVP_NAME2",...)
A procedure to insert AVPs for each specified AVP name in the list of AVP names in the PANA message. When an AVP name ends with "*", zero, one or more AVPs are inserted, otherwise one AVP is inserted.- boolean PANA_MESSAGE_NAME.exist_avp("AVP_NAME")
A procedure that checks whether an AVP of the specified AVP name exists in the specified PANA message and returns TRUE if the specified AVP is found, otherwise returns FALSE.- boolean generate_pana_sa()
A procedure to check whether the EAP method being used generates keys and that a PANA SA will be established on successful authentication. For the PaC, the procedure is also used to check and match the PRF and Integrity algorithm AVPs advertised by the PAA in PAR[S] message. For the PAA, it is used to indicate whether a PRF and Integrity algorithm AVPs will be sent in the PAR[S]. This procedure will return true if a PANA SA will be generated. Otherwise, it returns FALSE.- boolean key_available()
A procedure to check whether the PANA session has a PANA_AUTH_KEY. If the state machine already has a PANA_AUTH_KEY, it returns TRUE. If the state machine does not have a PANA_AUTH_KEY, it tries to retrieve an MSK from the EAP entity. If an MSK is retrieved, it computes a PANA_AUTH_KEY from the MSK and returns TRUE. Otherwise, it returns FALSE.
| TOC |
- PAR.RESULT_CODE
This variable contains the Result-Code AVP value in the PANA-Auth-Request message in process. When this variable carries PANA_SUCCESS it is assumed that the PAR message always contains an EAP-Payload AVP which carries an EAP-Success message.- NONCE_SENT
This variable is set to TRUE to indicate that a Nonce-AVP has already been sent. Otherwise it is set to FALSE.- RTX_COUNTER
This variable contains the current number of retransmissions of the outstanding PANA message.- Rx:PANA_MESSAGE_NAME[flag]
This event variable is set to TRUE when the specified PANA message is received from its peering PANA entity. The "flag" contains a flag (e.g., Rx:PAR[C]), except for 'R' (Request) flag.- RTX_TIMEOUT
This event variable is set to TRUE when the retransmission timer is expired.- REAUTH
This event variable is set to TRUE when an initiation of re-authentication phase is triggered.- TERMINATE
This event variable is set to TRUE when initiation of PANA session termination is triggered.- PANA_PING
This event variable is set to TRUE when initiation of liveness test based on PANA-Notification exchange is triggered.- SESS_TIMEOUT
This event is variable is set to TRUE when the session timer has expired.- LIFETIME_SESS_TIMEOUT
Configurable value used by the PaC and PAA to close or disconnect an established session in the access phase. This variable indicates the expiration of the session and is set to the value of Session-Lifetime AVP if present in the last PANA-Auth-Request message in the case of the PaC. Otherwise, it is assumed that the value is infinite and therefore has no expiration. Expiration of LIFETIME_SESS_TIMEOUT will cause the event variable SESS_TIMEOUT to be set.- ANY
This event variable is set to TRUE when any event occurs.
| TOC |
- RTX_MAX_NUM
Configurable maximum for how many retransmissions should be attempted before aborting.
| TOC |
When a message is prepared for sending, it is initialized as follows:
| TOC |
The state machines defined in this document assumes that the PaC and the PAA caches the last transmitted answer message. This scheme is described in Sec 5.2 of [RFC5191] (Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A. Yegin, “Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA),” May 2008.). When the PaC or PAA receives a re-transmitted or duplicate request, it would be able to re-send the corresponding answer without any aid from the EAP layer. However, to simplify the state machine description, this caching scheme is omitted in the state machines below. In the case that there is not corresponding answer to a re-transmitted request, the request will be handled by the corresponding statemachine.
| TOC |
The following transitions can occur at any state with exemptions explicitly noted.
---------- State: ANY ---------- Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State ------------------------+--------------------------+------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Re-transmissions)- - - - - - - - - - RTX_TIMEOUT && Retransmit(); (no change) RTX_COUNTER< RTX_MAX_NUM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (Reach maximum number of transmissions)- - - - - - (RTX_TIMEOUT && Disconnect(); CLOSED RTX_COUNTER>= RTX_MAX_NUM) || SESS_TIMEOUT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- State: ANY except INITIAL ------------------------- Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State ------------------------+--------------------------+------------ - - - - - - - - - - (liveness test initiated by peer)- - - - - - Rx:PNR[P] Tx:PNA[P](); (no change)
The following transitions can occur on any exit condition within the specified state.
------------- State: CLOSED ------------- Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State ------------------------+--------------------------+------------ - - - - - - - -(Catch all event on closed state) - - - - - - - - ANY None(); CLOSED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| TOC |
| TOC |
This interface defines the interactions between a PaC and an EAP peer. The interface serves as a mechanism to deliver EAP messages for the EAP peer. It allows the EAP peer to receive EAP requests and send EAP responses via the PaC. It also provides a mechanism to notify the EAP peer of PaC events and a mechanism to receive notification of EAP peer events. The EAP message delivery mechanism as well as the event notification mechanism in this interface have direct correlation with the PaC state transition table entries. These message delivery and event notifications mechanisms occur only within the context of their associated states or exit actions.
| TOC |
TxEAP() procedure in the PaC state machine serves as the mechanism to deliver EAP messages contained in PANA-Auth-Request messages to the EAP peer. This procedure is enabled only after an EAP restart event is notified to the EAP peer and before any event resulting in a termination of the EAP peer session. In the case where the EAP peer follows the EAP peer state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), TxEAP() procedure sets eapReq variable of the EAP peer state machine and puts the EAP request in eapReqData variable of the EAP peer state machine.
| TOC |
An EAP message is delivered from the EAP peer to the PaC via EAP_RESPONSE event variable. The event variable is set when the EAP peer passes the EAP message to its lower-layer. In the case where the EAP peer follows the EAP peer state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), EAP_RESPONSE event variable refers to eapResp variable of the EAP peer state machine and the EAP message is contained in eapRespData variable of the EAP peer state machine.
| TOC |
The EAP peer state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) has an initialization procedure before receiving an EAP message. To initialize the EAP state machine, the PaC state machine defines an event notification mechanism to send an EAP (re)start event to the EAP peer. The event notification is done via EAP_Restart() procedure in the initialization action of the PaC state machine.
| TOC |
In order for the EAP peer to notify the PaC of an EAP authentication result, EAP_SUCCESS and EAP_FAILURE event variables are defined. In the case where the EAP peer follows the EAP peer state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), EAP_SUCCESS and EAP_FAILURE event variables refer to eapSuccess and eapFail variables of the EAP peer state machine, respectively. In this case, if EAP_SUCCESS event variable is set to TRUE and an MSK is generated by the EAP authentication method in use, eapKeyAvailable variable is set to TRUE and eapKeyData variable contains the MSK. Note that EAP_SUCCESS and EAP_FAILURE event variables may be set to TRUE even before the PaC receives a PAR with a 'Complete' flag set from the PAA.
| TOC |
alt_reject() procedure in the PaC state machine serves as the mechanism to deliver an authentication failure event to the EAP peer without accompanying an EAP message. In the case where the EAP peer follows the EAP peer state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), alt_reject() procedure sets altReject variable of the EAP peer state machine. Note that the EAP peer state machine in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) also defines altAccept variable, however, it is never used in PANA in which EAP-Success messages are reliably delivered by the last PANA-Auth exchange.
| TOC |
- FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT
Configurable value that allows the PaC to determine whether a PaC authentication and authorization phase has stalled without an explicit EAP success or failure notification.
| TOC |
- AUTH_USER
This event variable is set to TRUE when initiation of EAP-based (re-)authentication is triggered by the application.- EAP_SUCCESS
This event variable is set to TRUE when the EAP peer determines that EAP conversation completes with success.- EAP_FAILURE
This event variable is set to TRUE when the EAP peer determines that EAP conversation completes with failure.- EAP_RESPONSE
This event variable is set to TRUE when the EAP peer delivers an EAP message to the PaC. This event accompanies an EAP message received from the EAP peer.- EAP_RESP_TIMEOUT
This event variable is set to TRUE when the PaC that has passed an EAP message to the EAP-layer does not receive a subsequent EAP message from the the EAP-layer in a given period. This provides a time limit for certain EAP methods where user interaction maybe required.
| TOC |
- boolean eap_piggyback()
This procedures returns TRUE to indicate whether the next EAP response will be carried in the pending PAN message for optimization.- void alt_reject()
This procedure informs the EAP peer of an authentication failure event without accompanying an EAP message.- void EAP_RespTimerStart()
A procedure to start a timer to receive an EAP-Response from the EAP peer.- void EAP_RespTimerStop()
A procedure to stop a timer to receive an EAP-Response from the EAP peer.
| TOC |
------------------------------
State: INITIAL (Initial State)
------------------------------
Initialization Action:
NONCE_SENT=Unset;
RTX_COUNTER=0;
RtxTimerStop();
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+-----------
- - - - - - - - - - (PaC-initiated Handshake) - - - - - - - - -
AUTH_USER Tx:PCI[](); INITIAL
RtxTimerStart();
SessionTimerReStart
(FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -(PAA-initiated Handshake, not optimized) - - - - -
Rx:PAR[S] && EAP_Restart(); WAIT_PAA
!PAR.exist_avp SessionTimerReStart
("EAP-Payload") (FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
if (generate_pana_sa())
Tx:PAN[S]("PRF-Algorithm",
"Integrity-Algorithm");
else
Tx:PAN[S]();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -(PAA-initiated Handshake, optimized) - - - - - -
Rx:PAR[S] && EAP_Restart(); INITIAL
PAR.exist_avp TxEAP();
("EAP-Payload") && SessionTimerReStart
eap_piggyback() (FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
Rx:PAR[S] && EAP_Restart(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
PAR.exist_avp TxEAP();
("EAP-Payload") && SessionTimerReStart
!eap_piggyback() (FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
if (generate_pana_sa())
Tx:PAN[S]("PRF-Algorithm",
"Integrity-Algorithm");
else
Tx:PAN[S]();
EAP_RESPONSE if (generate_pana_sa()) WAIT_PAA
Tx:PAN[S]("EAP-Payload",
"PRF-Algorithm",
"Integrity-Algorithm");
else
Tx:PAN[S]("EAP-Payload");
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------------
State: WAIT_PAA
---------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -(PAR-PAN exchange) - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAR[] && RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
!eap_piggyback() TxEAP();
EAP_RespTimerStart();
if (NONCE_SENT==Unset) {
NONCE_SENT=Set;
Tx:PAN[]("Nonce");
}
else
Tx:PAN[]();
Rx:PAR[] && RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
eap_piggyback() TxEAP();
EAP_RespTimerStart();
Rx:PAN[] RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_PAA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -(PANA result) - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAR[C] && TxEAP(); WAIT_EAP_RESULT
PAR.RESULT_CODE==
PANA_SUCCESS
Rx:PAR[C] && if (PAR.exist_avp WAIT_EAP_RESULT_
PAR.RESULT_CODE!= ("EAP-Payload")) CLOSE
PANA_SUCCESS TxEAP();
else
alt_reject();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------------
State: WAIT_EAP_MSG
-------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - (Return PAN/PAR from EAP) - - - - - - - - -
EAP_RESPONSE && EAP_RespTimerStop() WAIT_PAA
eap_piggyback() if (NONCE_SENT==Unset) {
Tx:PAN[]("EAP-Payload",
"Nonce");
NONCE_SENT=Set;
}
else
Tx:PAN[]("EAP-Payload");
EAP_RESPONSE && EAP_RespTimerStop() WAIT_PAA
!eap_piggyback() Tx:PAR[]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
EAP_RESP_TIMEOUT && Tx:PAN[](); WAIT_PAA
eap_piggyback()
EAP_FAILURE SessionTimerStop(); CLOSED
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------------
State: WAIT_EAP_RESULT
----------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - (EAP Result) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EAP_SUCCESS if (PAR.exist_avp OPEN
("Key-Id"))
Tx:PAN[C]("Key-Id");
else
Tx:PAN[C]();
Authorize();
SessionTimerReStart
(LIFETIME_SESS_TIMEOUT);
EAP_FAILURE Tx:PAN[C](); CLOSED
SessionTimerStop();
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------------------
State: WAIT_EAP_RESULT_CLOSE
----------------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - (EAP Result) - - - - - - - - - - - - -
EAP_SUCCESS || if (EAP_SUCCESS && CLOSED
EAP_FAILURE PAR.exist_avp("Key-Id"))
Tx:PAN[C]("Key-Id");
else
Tx:PAN[C]();
SessionTimerStop();
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------
State: OPEN
-----------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - (liveness test initiated by PaC)- - - - - -
PANA_PING Tx:PNR[P](); WAIT_PNA
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - (re-authentication initiated by PaC)- - - - - -
REAUTH NONCE_SENT=Unset; WAIT_PNA
Tx:PNR[A]();
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - (re-authentication initiated by PAA)- - - - - -
Rx:PAR[] EAP_RespTimerStart(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
TxEAP();
if (!eap_piggyback())
Tx:PAN[]("Nonce");
else
NONCE_SENT=Unset;
SessionTimerReStart
(FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -(Session termination initiated by PAA) - - - - - -
Rx:PTR[] Tx:PTA[](); CLOSED
SessionTimerStop();
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -(Session termination initiated by PaC) - - - - - -
TERMINATE Tx:PTR[](); SESS_TERM
RtxTimerStart();
SessionTimerStop();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------------
State: WAIT_PNA
---------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - -(re-authentication initiated by PaC) - - - - -
Rx:PNA[A] RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_PAA
SessionTimerReStart
(FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -(liveness test initiated by PaC) - - - - - - -
Rx:PNA[P] RtxTimerStop(); OPEN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------
State: SESS_TERM
----------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - -(Session termination initiated by PaC) - - - - -
Rx:PTA[] Disconnect(); CLOSED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| TOC |
| TOC |
The interface between a PAA and an EAP authenticator provides a mechanism to deliver EAP messages for the EAP authenticator as well as a mechanism to notify the EAP authenticator of PAA events and to receive notification of EAP authenticator events. These message delivery and event notification mechanisms occur only within context of their associated states or exit actions.
| TOC |
An EAP authenticator state machine defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.) has an initialization procedure before sending the first EAP request. To initialize the EAP state machine, the PAA state machine defines an event notification mechanism to send an EAP (re)start event to the EAP authenticator. The event notification is done via EAP_Restart() procedure in the initialization action of the PAA state machine.
| TOC |
TxEAP() procedure in the PAA state machine serves as the mechanism to deliver EAP-Responses contained in PANA-Auth-Answer messages to the EAP authenticator. This procedure is enabled only after an EAP restart event is notified to the EAP authenticator and before any event resulting in a termination of the EAP authenticator session. In the case where the EAP authenticator follows the EAP authenticator state machines defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), TxEAP() procedure sets eapResp variable of the EAP authenticator state machine and puts the EAP response in eapRespData variable of the EAP authenticator state machine.
| TOC |
An EAP request is delivered from the EAP authenticator to the PAA via EAP_REQUEST event variable. The event variable is set when the EAP authenticator passes the EAP request to its lower-layer. In the case where the EAP authenticator follows the EAP authenticator state machines defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), EAP_REQUEST event variable refers to eapReq variable of the EAP authenticator state machine and the EAP request is contained in eapReqData variable of the EAP authenticator state machine.
| TOC |
In order for the EAP authenticator to notify the PAA of the EAP authentication result, EAP_SUCCESS, EAP_FAILURE and EAP_TIMEOUT event variables are defined. In the case where the EAP authenticator follows the EAP authenticator state machines defined in [RFC4137] (Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” August 2005.), EAP_SUCCESS, EAP_FAILURE and EAP_TIMEOUT event variables refer to eapSuccess, eapFail and eapTimeout variables of the EAP authenticator state machine, respectively. In this case, if EAP_SUCCESS event variable is set to TRUE, an EAP-Success message is contained in eapReqData variable of the EAP authenticator state machine, and additionally, eapKeyAvailable variable is set to TRUE and eapKeyData variable contains an MSK if the MSK is generated as a result of successful authentication by the EAP authentication method in use. Similarly, if EAP_FAILURE event variable is set to TRUE, an EAP-Failure message is contained in eapReqData variable of the EAP authenticator state machine. The PAA uses EAP_SUCCESS, EAP_FAILURE and EAP_TIMEOUT event variables as a trigger to send a PAR message to the PaC.
| TOC |
- OPTIMIZED_INIT
This variable indicates whether the PAA is able to piggyback an EAP-Request in the initial PANA-Auth-Request. Otherwise it is set to FALSE.- PAC_FOUND
This variable is set to TRUE as a result of a PAA initiated handshake.- REAUTH_TIMEOUT
This event variable is set to TRUE to indicate that the PAA initiates a re-authentication with the PaC. The re-authentication timeout should be set to a value less than the session timeout carried in the Session-Lifetime AVP if present.- EAP_SUCCESS
This event variable is set to TRUE when EAP conversation completes with success. This event accompanies an EAP- Success message passed from the EAP authenticator.- EAP_FAILURE
This event variable is set to TRUE when EAP conversation completes with failure. This event accompanies an EAP- Failure message passed from the EAP authenticator.- EAP_REQUEST
This event variable is set to TRUE when the EAP authenticator delivers an EAP Request to the PAA. This event accompanies an EAP-Request message received from the EAP authenticator.- EAP_TIMEOUT
This event variable is set to TRUE when EAP conversation times out without generating an EAP-Success or an EAP-Failure message. This event does not accompany any EAP message.
| TOC |
- boolean new_key_available()
A procedure to check whether the PANA session has a new PANA_AUTH_KEY. If the state machine already have a PANA_AUTH_KEY, it returns FALSE. If the state machine does not have a PANA_AUTH_KEY, it tries to retrieve an MSK from the EAP entity. If an MSK has been retrieved, it computes a PANA_AUTH_KEY from the MSK and returns TRUE. Otherwise, it returns FALSE.
| TOC |
------------------------------
State: INITIAL (Initial State)
------------------------------
Initialization Action:
OPTIMIZED_INIT=Set|Unset;
NONCE_SENT=Unset;
RTX_COUNTER=0;
RtxTimerStop();
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - (PCI and PAA initiated PANA) - - - - - - - - -
(Rx:PCI[] || if (OPTIMIZED_INIT == INITIAL
PAC_FOUND) Set) {
EAP_Restart();
SessionTimerReStart
(FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
}
else {
if (generate_pana_sa())
Tx:PAR[S]("PRF-Algorithm",
"Integrity-Algorithm");
else
Tx:PAR[S]();
}
EAP_REQUEST if (generate_pana_sa()) INITIAL
Tx:PAR[S]("EAP-Payload",
"PRF-Algorithm",
"Integrity-Algorithm");
else
Tx:PAR[S]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAN Handling) - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAN[S] && if (PAN.exist_avp WAIT_EAP_MSG
((OPTIMIZED_INIT == ("EAP-Payload"))
Unset) || TxEAP();
PAN.exist_avp else {
("EAP-Payload")) EAP_Restart();
SessionTimerReStart
(FAILED_SESS_TIMEOUT);
}
Rx:PAN[S] && None(); WAIT_PAN_OR_PAR
(OPTIMIZED_INIT ==
Set) &&
! PAN.exist_avp
("EAP-Payload")
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-------------------
State: WAIT_EAP_MSG
-------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - -(Receiving EAP-Request)- - - - - - - - -
EAP_REQUEST if (NONCE_SENT==Unset) { WAIT_PAN_OR_PAR
Tx:PAR[]("Nonce",
"EAP-Payload");
NONCE_SENT=Set;
}
else
Tx:PAR[]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -(Receiving EAP-Success/Failure) - - - - -
EAP_FAILURE PAR.RESULT_CODE = WAIT_FAIL_PAN
PANA_AUTHENTICATION_
REJECTED;
Tx:PAR[C]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
SessionTimerStop();
EAP_SUCCESS && PAR.RESULT_CODE = WAIT_SUCC_PAN
Authorize() PANA_SUCCESS;
if (new_key_available())
Tx:PAR[C]("EAP-Payload",
"Key-Id");
else
Tx:PAR[C]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
EAP_SUCCESS && PAR.RESULT_CODE = WAIT_FAIL_PAN
!Authorize() PANA_AUTHORIZATION_
REJECTED;
if (new_key_available())
Tx:PAR[C]("EAP-Payload",
"Key-Id");
else
Tx:PAR[C]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - (Receiving EAP-Timeout or invalid message) - - - - -
EAP_TIMEOUT SessionTimerStop(); CLOSED
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------------
State: WAIT_SUCC_PAN
--------------------
Event/Condition Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAN Processing)- - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAN[C] RtxTimerStop(); OPEN
SessionTimerReStart
(LIFETIME_SESS_TIMEOUT);
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------------
State: WAIT_FAIL_PAN
--------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAN Processing)- - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAN[C] RtxTimerStop(); CLOSED
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------
State: OPEN
-----------
Event/Condition Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - (re-authentication initiated by PaC) - - - - - -
Rx:PNR[A] NONCE_SENT=Unset; WAIT_EAP_MSG
EAP_Restart();
Tx:PNA[A]();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - (re-authentication initiated by PAA)- - - - - -
REAUTH || NONCE_SENT=Unset; WAIT_EAP_MSG
REAUTH_TIMEOUT EAP_Restart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - (liveness test based on PNR-PNA exchange initiated by PAA)-
PANA_PING Tx:PNR[P](); WAIT_PNA_PING
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - (Session termination initated from PAA) - - - -
TERMINATE Tx:PTR[](); SESS_TERM
SessionTimerStop();
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - (Session termination initated from PaC) - - - -
Rx:PTR[] Tx:PTA[](); CLOSED
SessionTimerStop();
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------------
State: WAIT_PNA_PING
--------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -(PNA processing) - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PNA[P] RtxTimerStop(); OPEN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------------
State: WAIT_PAN_OR_PAR
----------------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - (PAR Processing)- - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PAR[] TxEAP(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
RtxTimerStop();
Tx:PAN[]();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - (Pass EAP Response to the EAP authenticator)- - - -
Rx:PAN[] && TxEAP(); WAIT_EAP_MSG
PAN.exist_avp RtxTimerStop();
("EAP-Payload")
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - (PAN without an EAP response) - - - - - - -
Rx:PAN[] && RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_PAN_OR_PAR
!PAN.exist_avp
("EAP-Payload")
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - -(EAP retransmission) - - - - - - - - - -
EAP_REQUEST RtxTimerStop(); WAIT_PAN_OR_PAR
Tx:PAR[]("EAP-Payload");
RtxTimerStart();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - (EAP authentication timeout or failure)- - - - -
EAP_FAILURE || RtxTimerStop(); CLOSED
EAP_TIMEOUT SessionTimerStop();
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
----------------
State: SESS_TERM
----------------
Exit Condition Exit Action Exit State
------------------------+--------------------------+------------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -(PTA processing) - - - - - - - - - -
Rx:PTA[] RtxTimerStop(); CLOSED
Disconnect();
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| TOC |
| TOC |
In general, it is assumed in each device that has a PANA protocol stack that there is a Service Management Entity (SME) that manages the PANA protocol stack. It is recommended that a generic interface (i.e., the SME-PANA interface) between the SME and the PANA protocol stack be provided by the implementation. Especially, common procedures such as startup, shutdown, re-authenticate signals and provisions for extracting keying material should be provided by such an interface. The SME-PANA interface in a PAA device should also provide a method for communicating filtering parameters to the EP(s). When cryptographic filtering is used, the filtering parameters include keying material used for bootstrapping per-packet ciphering. When a PAA device interacts with the backend authentication server using a AAA protocol, its SME may also have an interface to the AAA protocol to obtain authorization parameters such as the authorization lifetime and additional filtering parameters.
| TOC |
This document's intent is to describe the PANA state machines fully. To this end, any security concerns with this document are likely a reflection of security concerns with PANA itself.
| TOC |
This document has no actions for IANA.
| TOC |
This work was started from state machines originally made by Dan Forsberg.
| TOC |
| TOC |
| [RFC5191] | Forsberg, D., Ohba, Y., Patil, B., Tschofenig, H., and A. Yegin, “Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access (PANA),” RFC 5191, May 2008 (TXT). |
| TOC |
| [RFC4137] | Vollbrecht, J., Eronen, P., Petroni, N., and Y. Ohba, “State Machines for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Peer and Authenticator,” RFC 4137, August 2005 (TXT, PDF). |
| TOC |
| Victor Fajardo (editor) | |
| Toshiba America Research, Inc. | |
| 1 Telcordia Drive | |
| Piscataway, NJ 08854 | |
| USA | |
| Phone: | +1 732 699 5368 |
| Email: | vfajardo@tari.toshiba.com |
| Yoshihiro Ohba | |
| Toshiba America Research, Inc. | |
| 1 Telcordia Drive | |
| Piscataway, NJ 08854 | |
| USA | |
| Phone: | +1 732 699 5305 |
| Email: | yohba@tari.toshiba.com |
| Rafa Marin Lopez | |
| University of Murcia | |
| 30071 Murcia | |
| Spain | |
| Email: | rafa@dif.um.es |
| TOC |
Copyright © The IETF Trust (2008).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an “AS IS” basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org.