| TOC |
|
This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress.”
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt.
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 14, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2009 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents in effect on the date of publication of this document (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
This memo defines a mapping from Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) notifications to SYSLOG messages.
1.
Introduction
1.1.
Conventions
2.
Background
2.1.
SNMP Notifications
2.2.
SYSLOG Notifications
3.
Mapping SNMP Notifications to SYSLOG Messages
3.1.
SYSLOG Header
3.2.
Structured Data
3.3.
MSG Data
4.
Relationship to the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB
5.
Usage Example
6.
IANA Considerations
7.
Security Considerations
8.
Acknowledgments
9.
References
9.1.
Normative References
9.2.
Informative References
§
Authors' Addresses
| TOC |
SNMP and SYSLOG are two widely used protocols to communicate event notifications. Although co-existence of several management protocols in one operational environment is possible, certain environments require that all event notifications are collected by a single system daemon such as a SYSLOG collector or an SNMP notification receiver via a single management protocol. In such environments, it is necessary to translate event notifications between management protocols.
The latest version of SYSLOG, specified in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.), supports a structured data element format. Structured data elements allow us to map between SNMP notifications and SYSLOG messages without losing information. In this memo we specify a concrete mapping from SNMP event notifications [RFC3416] (Presuhn, R., “Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.) into SYSLOG messages [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.). We specify how the SYSLOG message format should be utilized to carry the information contained in an SNMP notification message. A new SYSLOG structured data element is defined which carries the PDU portion of an SNMP notification message.
| TOC |
A system which has the capability of receiving SNMP notification messages from an SNMP Notification Originator and sending the SNMP data contained inside in a SYSLOG message format to a SYSLOG collector is referred in this memo as an "SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator". By definition, such a system should have an SNMP Notification Receiver application and a SYSLOG originator running in order to be able to perform the functions of an "SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator".
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] (Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” March 1997.).
| TOC |
| TOC |
A detailed introduction to the SNMP Management Framework can be found in [RFC3410] (Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, “Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework,” December 2002.). The SNMP Management Architecture is described in [RFC3411] (Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, “An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks,” December 2002.). Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB [RFC3418] (Presuhn, R., “Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI [RFC2578] (McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, “Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2),” April 1999.).
An SNMP notification message is generated and transmitted by an SNMP entity on behalf of a Notification Originator application [RFC3413] (Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, “Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications,” December 2002.). SNMP notifications are often used to notify a Notification Receiver application at a logically remote SNMP entity that an event has occurred or that a certain condition is present. There are two types of SNMP protocol operations that are associated with SNMP notification messages [RFC3416] (Presuhn, R., “Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.):
The scopedPDU portion of an SNMPv3 trap or inform message has the following format [RFC3412] (Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, “Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.):
ScopedPDU ::= SEQUENCE {
contextEngineID OCTET STRING,
contextName OCTET STRING,
data ANY -- e.g., PDUs as defined in [RFC3416]
}
The data member of the SEQUENCE ScopedPDU carries a SNMPv2-Trap-PDU or an InformRequest-PDU. They both have the same structure:
PDUs ::= [7] IMPLICIT SEQUENCE {
request-id INTEGER,
error-status INTEGER, -- ignored in notifications
error-index INTEGER, -- ignored in notifications
variable-bindings VarBindList
}
-- variable binding
VarBind ::= SEQUENCE {
name ObjectName,
CHOICE {
value ObjectSyntax,
unSpecified NULL, -- in retrieval requests
-- exceptions in responses
noSuchObject [0] IMPLICIT NULL,
noSuchInstance [1] IMPLICIT NULL,
endOfMibView [2] IMPLICIT NULL
}
}
-- variable-binding list
VarBindList ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE (0..max-bindings)) OF VarBind
The first two variable bindings in the variable binding list of an SNMPv2-Trap-PDU or InformRequest-PDU are sysUpTime.0 [RFC3418] (Presuhn, R., “Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.) and snmpTrapOID.0 [RFC3418] (Presuhn, R., “Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.) respectively. If the OBJECTS clause is present in the invocation of the corresponding NOTIFICATION-TYPE macro, then each corresponding variable, as instantiated by this notification, is copied, in order, to the variable-bindings field. If any additional variables are being included (at the option of the generating SNMP entity), then each is copied to the variable-bindings field.
In the case of SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c notifications, the contextEngineID and the contextName parameters are not present in notification messages.
This document assumes that notifications are in the format defined in RFC 3416 [RFC3416] (Presuhn, R., “Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” December 2002.). Notifications in the SNMPv1 notification format MUST be translated as described in Section 3.1 of RFC 3584 [RFC3584] (Frye, R., Levi, D., Routhier, S., and B. Wijnen, “Coexistence between Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework.,” August 2003.).
| TOC |
The SYSLOG protocol is defined in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.). The message contains a global header and a number of structured data elements. The ABNF [RFC5234] (Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.) representation of a SYSLOG message is defined in RFC 5424 [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.). The relevant productions for structured data elements are:
STRUCTURED-DATA = NILVALUE / 1*SD-ELEMENT
SD-ELEMENT = "[" SD-ID *(SP SD-PARAM) "]"
SD-PARAM = PARAM-NAME "=" %d34 PARAM-VALUE %d34
SD-ID = SD-NAME
PARAM-NAME = SD-NAME
PARAM-VALUE = UTF-8-STRING ; characters '"', '\' and
; ']' MUST be escaped.
SD-NAME = 1*32PRINTUSASCII
; except '=', SP, ']', %d34 (")
UTF-8-STRING = *OCTET ; Any VALID UTF-8 String
; "shortest form" MUST be used
OCTET = %d00-255
SP = %d32
PRINTUSASCII = %d33-126
NILVALUE = "-"
| TOC |
In this section, we define how the scopedPDU portion from a SNMP notification message is used to generate a message in the SYSLOG format. The notification receiver application at the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator is listening for incoming notifications. After a notification is received by the SNMP engine the data portion is forwarded to the notification receiver application. The data portion contains the scopedPDU of the message which is used by the SYSLOG originator on the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator to generate a SYSLOG message and send it to a SYSLOG collector (or proxy). Note that every SNMP notification maps to exactly one SYSLOG message.
+------------+ +------------------+ |snmp | snmp | | syslog +---------+ |notification| notification | +------------+ | message |syslog | |originator |------------->| |syslog | |-------->|collector| +------------+ | |originator | | +---------+ +------------+ | +------------+ | |snmp | snmp | +------------+ | syslog +---------+ |notification| notification | |snmp | | message |syslog | |originator |------------->| |notification| |-------->|collector| +------------+ | |receiver | | +---------+ +------------+ | +------------+ | |snmp | snmp | | |notification| notification | SNMP-to-SYSLOG | |originator |------------->| translator | +------------+ +------------------+
| Figure 1: SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator deployment |
A common deployment scenario is shown in Figure 1 (SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator deployment). There can be many SNMP notification originators which send SNMP event notifications to a SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator. The SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator extracts the data portion of the notification, generates a SYSLOG message, and send the SYSLOG message to a SYSLOG collector, which is responsible for collecting and storing all notification messages. The arrows in Figure 1 (SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator deployment) indicate message flows, not individual messages.
The SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator is not transparent for a SYSLOG collector. The global header of the SYSLOG message generated by the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator is filled with parameters that are specific for the system running the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator such as its hostname, time stamp, etc. The data portion (scopedPDU for SNMPv3 or PDU for SNMPv1/SNMPv2c) of the SNMP notification message is contained in the structured data of the SYSLOG message.
Implementations MUST drop invalid SNMP messages before they are passed to the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator.
| TOC |
The SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator fills the HEADER field of a SYSLOG message with parameters specific to the system on which it is running. The default facility level for SYSLOG messages containing SNMP notifications SHOULD be 3, which corresponds to messages generated by system daemons. The default severity level SHOULD be 5, which corresponds to "Notice: normal but significant condition". If the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator has a notion of the type of notification that has been received it might choose other values for facility and severity level.
The VERSION, TIMESTAMP, HOSTNAME, APP-NAME, PROCID and MSGID fields in the SYSLOG message header are filled with values that are specific to the system on which the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator is running. The character set used in the HEADER MUST be seven-bit ASCII in an eight-bit field as described in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.).
| TOC |
The STRUCTURED-DATA field of a SYSLOG message carries the ScopedPDU (or PDU) portion of an SNMP notification message. For the purpose of carrying SNMP notification data, a new SD-ID element is defined. The ABNF [RFC5234] (Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” January 2008.) representation of the new structured element is:
SNMP-SD-ELEMENT = "[" SNMP-SD-ID [CTX] *VARBIND "]"
SNMP-SD-ID = %x73.6E.6D.70 ; snmp
CTX = CTXENGINE CTXNAME
CTXENGINE = SP "ctxEngine=" %d34 HEXSTRING %d34
CTXNAME = SP "ctxName=" %d34 PARAM-VALUE %d34
VARBIND = SP VARNAME [SP VARLABEL] SP VARVALUE [SP VALSTRING]
VARNAME = %d118 NUM "=" %d34 OID %d34 ; "vN="
VARLABEL = %d108 NUM "=" %d34 PARAM-VALUE %d34 ; "lN="
VARVALUE = VALOID / VALHEXSTRING / VALCOUNTER32 / VALCOUNTER64
/ VALUNSIGNED32 / VALINTEGER32 / VALIP / VALNULL
/ VALOPAQUE / VALTIMETICKS / VALSTRING
VALOID = %d111 NUM "=" %d34 OID %d34 ; "oN="
VALHEXSTRING = %d120 NUM "=" %d34 HEXSTRING %d34 ; "xN="
VALCOUNTER32 = %d99 NUM "=" %d34 UNSIGNED32 %d34 ; "cN="
VALCOUNTER64 = %d67 NUM "=" %d34 UNSIGNED64 %d34 ; "CN="
VALUNSIGNED32 = %d117 NUM "=" %d34 UNSIGNED32 %d34 ; "uN="
VALINTEGER32 = %d100 NUM "=" %d34 INTEGER32 %d34 ; "dN="
VALIP = %d105 NUM "=" %d34 IPV4ADDRESS %d34 ; "iN="
VALNULL = %d110 NUM "=" %d34 %d34 ; "nN="
VALOPAQUE = %d112 NUM "=" %d34 HEXSTRING %d34 ; "pN="
VALTIMETICKS = %d116 NUM "=" %d34 UNSIGNED32 %d34 ; "tN="
VALSTRING = %d97 NUM "=" %d34 PARAM-VALUE %d34 ; "aN="
NUM = NONZERODIGIT 0*DIGIT
OID = OIDSTART *("." OIDSUBID)
OIDSTART = (("0." / "1.") [%d49-51] DIGIT) / ("2." OIDSUBID)
OIDSUBID = ZERO / (NONZERODIGIT *DIGIT)
PARAM-VALUE = UTF-8-STRING ; characters '"', '\' and
; ']' MUST be escaped.
UTF-8-STRING = *OCTET ; Any VALID UTF-8 String
; "shortest form" MUST be used
HEXSTRING = *HEX
INTEGER32 = ["-"] NONZERODIGIT 0*DIGIT
UNSIGNED32 = NONZERODIGIT 0*DIGIT
UNSIGNED64 = NONZERODIGIT 0*DIGIT
IPV4ADDRESS = d8 "." d8 "." d8 "." d8
d8 = DIGIT ; 0-9
/ %d49-57 DIGIT ; 10-99
/ "1" 2DIGIT ; 100-199
/ "2" %d48-52 DIGIT ; 200-249
/ "25" %d48-53 ; 250-255
HEX = DIGIT / %x41-46 / %x61-66 ; 0-9 / A-F / a-f
NONZERODIGIT = %d49-57
ZERO = %d48
DIGIT = ZERO / NONZERODIGIT
SP = %d32
Each SNMP-SD-ELEMENT starts with the SD-ID "snmp". The first two SD-ID parameters are "ctxEngine" and "ctxName". The context MUST be present in an SNMPv3 notification and therefore they MUST be present in a SYSLOG message generated by an SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator from an SNMPv3 notification. The contexdEngineID is encoded as an hexadecimal string while the contextName is encoded as a UTF8 string.
The remaining parameters in the "snmp" SD-ID correspond to the varbind list elements contained in the SNMP PDU. The name of a varbind is encoded as an OID in dotted notation. The rendered OID is carried in a "vN" parameter, where N identifies the position of the varbind in the varbind list of the SNMP message (the first varbind having the position 1). A MIB aware implementation may in addition generate a parameter "lN" carrying the descriptor of the associated MIB object plus the instance identifier suffix (also called an OID label). The number N again identifies the position of the varbind in the varbind list of the SNMP message.
The value of a varbind is encoded depending on its type according to the rules shown in Table 1 (Mapping of SNMP Types to SD Params) and type specific parameter names are used to convey the type information. The number N again identifies the position of the varbind in the varbind list of the SNMP message. A MIB aware implementation may in addition generate a parameter "aN" carrying a alternate textual representation of the value, which is obtained by applying DISPLAY-HINTs and translating named numbers into corresponding labels or OBJECT IDENTIFIER values to descriptors. For SNMP object types that have a DISPLAY-HINT of the form 'Ma' or 'Mt' where M is some number, a MIB aware implementation can choose to include the "aN" parameter and to suppress the corresponding "xN" parameter. This special case allows to save space for textual objects. A receiver receiving a "aN" parameter without a matching value at position N can unambiguously convert the value carried in the "aN" parameter back to an OCTET STRING value.
While the inclusion of additional parameters carrying OID labels or alternate value representations increases human readability, this comes at the cost of increased message size which may cause truncation of SYSLOG message. Therefore, implementations SHOULD provide a configuration mechanism to enable/disable the generation of parameters carrying OID labels or alternate value representations.
| SNMP Type | PARAM-NAME | Value Encoding |
|---|---|---|
| OBJECT IDENTIFIER | oN | dotted-decimal notation |
| OCTET STRING | xN | hexadecimal string |
| Counter32 | cN | unsigned decimal number |
| Counter64 | CN | unsigned decimal number |
| Unsigned32 | uN | unsigned decimal number |
| INTEGER, Integer32 | dN | signed decimal number |
| IpAddress | iN | dotted quad notation |
| Opaque | pN | hexadecimal (BER) string |
| TimeTicks | tN | unsigned decimal number |
| NULL | nN | zero-length string |
| Table 1: Mapping of SNMP Types to SD Params |
The SYSLOG message generated by the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator may, in addition to the SNMP-SD-ELEMENT, include other structured data elements in its structured data part. These additional structured data elements MUST comply with the specification in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.).
In particular, the parameters in the "origin" SD-ID SHOULD identify the originator of the SNMP notification. A suitable value for the "ip" parameter MAY be taken from the snmpTrapAddress varbind if present and a suitable value for the "enterpriseId" parameter MAY be extracted from snmpTrapOID varbind.
| TOC |
The MSG part of the SYSLOG message is optional and may contain a free-form message that provides a textual description of the SNMP event notification. According to [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.), the character set used in MSG SHOULD be UNICODE, encoded using UTF-8 as specified in [RFC3629] (Yergeau, F., “UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646,” November 2003.). If the originator can not encode the MSG in Unicode, it MAY use any other encoding. The originator MAY use the "language" parameters defined in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.) to convey information about the natural language used inside MSG.
| TOC |
A companion document defines an SNMP MIB module to represent SYSLOG messages and to send SYSLOG messages as SNMP notifications to SNMP notification receivers [I‑D.ietf‑opsawg‑syslog‑msg‑mib] (Schoenwaelder, J., Clemm, A., and A. Karmakar, “Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications,” March 2009.). This section discusses the possibilities of using both specifications in combination.
A SYSLOG collector implementing the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB module and the mapping of SNMP notifications to SYSLOG messages may be configured to translate received SYSLOG messages containing SNMP notifications back into the original SNMP notification. In this case, the relevant tables of the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB will not be populated for SYSLOG messages carrying SNMP notifications. This configuration allows operators to build a forwarding chain where SNMP notifications are "tunneled" through SYSLOG messages. Due to size restrictions of the SYSLOG transports and the more verbose textual encoding used by SYSLOG, there is a possibility that SNMP notification content gets truncated while tunneled through SYSLOG and thus the resulting SNMP notification may be incomplete.
An SNMP management application supporting the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB and the mapping of SNMP notifications to SYSLOG messages may process information from the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB in order to emit a SYSLOG message representing the SYSLOG message recorded in the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB module. This configuration allows operators to build a forwarding chain where SYSLOG messages are "tunneled" through SNMP messages. A notification receiver can determine whether a syslogMsgNotification contained all structured data element parameters of a SYSLOG message. In case parameters are missing, a forwarding application MUST retrieve the missing parameters from the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB. Regular polling of the SYSLOG-MSG-MIB can be used to take care of any lost SNMP notifications.
| TOC |
Here we provide an example how an SNMP linkUp trap message is mapped into a SYSLOG message by using the mappings defined in Section 3.1 (SYSLOG Header) and Section 3.2 (Structured Data).
The linkUp notification is defined in [RFC2863] (McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, “The Interfaces Group MIB,” June 2000.) as follows:
linkUp NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { ifIndex, ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A linkUp trap signifies that the SNMP entity, acting in an
agent role, has detected that the ifOperStatus object for
one of its communication links left the down state and
transitioned into some other state (but not into the
notPresent state). This other state is indicated by the
included value of ifOperStatus."
::= { snmpTraps 4 }
The scopedPDU portion of an SNMP linkUp trap sent using the SNMPv3 message format is shown below (left columns shows the BER encoding while the right column indicates the corresponding ASN.1 definitions):
30:7C SEQUENCE {
04:08:80:00:02:B8:04:61:62:63 800002b804616263
04:04:63:74:78:31 "ctx1"
A7:6A SNMPv2-Trap-PDU {
02:03:6D:08:67 INTEGER 7145575
02:01:00 INTEGER 0
02:01:00 INTEGER 0
30:5D SEQUENCE OF {
30:0F SEQUENCE {
06:08:2B:06:01:02:01:01:03:00 sysUpTime.0
43:03:01:72:8C 94860 }
30:17 SEQUENCE {
06:0A:2B:06:01:06:03:01:01:04:01:00 snmpTrapOID.0
06:09:2B:06:01:06:03:01:01:05:04 linkUp }
30:0F SEQUENCE {
06:0A:2B:06:01:02:01:02:02:01:01:03 ifIndex.3
02:01:03 3 }
30:0F SEQUENCE {
06:0A:2B:06:01:02:01:02:02:01:07:03 ifAdminStatus.3
02:01:01 up(1) }
30:0F SEQUENCE {
06:0A:2B:06:01:02:01:02:02:01:08:03 ifOperStatus.3
02:01:01 up(1) } } } }
The corresponding SYSLOG message generated by the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator is shown below. (SYSLOG examples should be considered to be on one line. They are wrapped on multiple lines in this document for readability purposes only.)
<29>1 2003-10-11T22:14:15.003Z mymachine.example.com snmptrapd - ID47
[snmp ctxEngine="800002b804616263" ctxName="ctx1"
v1="1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0" l1="sysUpTime.0" d1="94860"
v2="1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.4.1.0" l2="snmpTrapOID.0"
o2="1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4" a2="linkUp"
v3="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.3" d3="3"
v4="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.7.3" d4="1" a4="up"
v5="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.3" d5="1" a5="up"]
The corresponding SYSLOG message has a priority value of 29 which means a facility level of 3 (system daemons) and a severity level of 5 (Notice: Normal but significant condition) according to the algorithm for calculation of priority value specified in Section 6.2.1 of [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.). The rest of the fields in the header of the SYSLOG message are parameters that are specific to the system running the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator. The SYSLOG version is 1 and the message was generated at 22:14:15.003Z on 2003-10-11T by the host "mymachine.example.com". The application on the SNMP-to-SYSLOG translator that generated the message was "snmptrapd", there is no information about the process id and the message on the SNMP-to-SYSLOG system is identified with the MSGID of ID47.
The SYSLOG message contains one structured data element with a SD-ID of "snmp" which means that this is the scopedPDU portion of an SNMP event notification message. The data which is contained in the notification is associated with the ContextEngineID "123456" and ContextName "ctx1". The request-id of the SNMP notification message was "7145575". Then follows the data portion of the scopedPDU. The first two variables contained in the data portion are always the sysUpTime.0 and snmpTrapOID.0. An snmpTrapOID.0 with a value of "1.3.6.1.6.3.1.1.5.4" means that this is a linkUp trap. The parameters v3="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.3" d3="3" mean that the SNMP notification message is carrying the ifIndex object which has a type INTEGER and has a value of 3. The parameters v4="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.7.3" d4="1" mean that the SNMP notification message is carrying the object ifAdminStatus which has type INTEGER and a value of 1. The parameters v5="1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.3" d5="1" mean that the SNMP notification message is carrying the object ifOperStatus which has type INTEGER and a value of "1".
| TOC |
IANA is requested to register the SD-ID value "snmp" together with the PARAM-NAME values specified in Section 3.2 (Structured Data) in the registry for SYSLOG structured data id values according to Section 9 in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.). The notation <N> indicates a position number.
SD-ID PARAM-NAME
snmp OPTIONAL
ctxEngine OPTIONAL
ctxName OPTIONAL
v<N> OPTIONAL
l<N> OPTIONAL
o<N> OPTIONAL
x<N> OPTIONAL
c<N> OPTIONAL
C<N> OPTIONAL
u<N> OPTIONAL
d<N> OPTIONAL
i<N> OPTIONAL
n<N> OPTIONAL
p<N> OPTIONAL
t<N> OPTIONAL
a<N> OPTIONAL
| TOC |
The security considerations discussed in [RFC5424] (Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” March 2009.) apply to this document.
The SNMP architecture supports an access control mechanism ensuring that SNMP notifications are only sent to receivers who are authorized to receive the notification. Network operators using this mapping of SNMP notifications to SYSLOG messages should enforce a consistent policy preventing people from accessing SNMP notifications via the SYSLOG mapping that would otherwise not be accessible.
| TOC |
The editors wish to thank the following individuals for providing helpful comments on various versions of this document: Martin Bjorklund, Washam Fan, Rainer Gerhards, Tom Petch, and Dan Romascanu.
| TOC |
| TOC |
| [I-D.ietf-opsawg-syslog-msg-mib] | Schoenwaelder, J., Clemm, A., and A. Karmakar, “Definitions of Managed Objects for Mapping SYSLOG Messages to Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Notifications,” Internet Draft (work in progress), March 2009. |
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., “Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels,” BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC3411] | Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, “An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks,” STD 62, RFC 3411, December 2002. |
| [RFC3412] | Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, “Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” STD 62, RFC 3412, December 2002. |
| [RFC3413] | Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, “Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications,” STD 62, RFC 3413, December 2002. |
| [RFC3416] | Presuhn, R., “Version 2 of the Protocol Operations for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002. |
| [RFC3418] | Presuhn, R., “Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP),” STD 62, RFC 3418, December 2002. |
| [RFC3584] | Frye, R., Levi, D., Routhier, S., and B. Wijnen, “Coexistence between Version 1, Version 2, and Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework.,” BCP 74, RFC 3584, August 2003. |
| [RFC3629] | Yergeau, F., “UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646,” STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003. |
| [RFC5234] | Crocker, D. and P. Overell, “Augmented BNF for Syntax Specifications: ABNF,” RFC 5234, January 2008. |
| [RFC5424] | Gerhards, R., “The Syslog Protocol,” RFC 5424, March 2009. |
| TOC |
| [RFC2578] | McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, “Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2),” RFC 2578, STD 58, April 1999. |
| [RFC2863] | McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, “The Interfaces Group MIB,” RFC 2863, June 2000. |
| [RFC3410] | Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, “Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework,” RFC 3410, December 2002. |
| TOC |
| Vladislav Marinov | |
| Jacobs University Bremen | |
| Campus Ring 1 | |
| 28725 Bremen | |
| Germany | |
| Email: | v.marinov@jacobs-university.de |
| Juergen Schoenwaelder | |
| Jacobs University Bremen | |
| Campus Ring 1 | |
| 28725 Bremen | |
| Germany | |
| Email: | j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de |