Internet-Draft | DNS Aliases Proxy-Status | June 2023 |
Pauly | Expires 22 December 2023 | [Page] |
This document defines the next-hop-aliases
HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter. This parameter carries
the list of aliases and canonical names an intermediary received during DNS resolution as part
establishing a connection to the next hop.¶
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.¶
Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status/.¶
Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group mailing list (mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org), which is archived at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/. Working Group information can be found at https://httpwg.org/.¶
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/labels/alias-proxy-status.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 December 2023.¶
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
The Proxy-Status HTTP response field [PROXY-STATUS] allows intermediaries to convey information about how they handled the request in HTTP responses sent to clients. It defines a set of parameters that provide information, such as the name of the next hop.¶
[PROXY-STATUS] defines a next-hop
parameter, which can contain a hostname,
IP address, or alias of the next hop. This parameter can contain only one such item,
so it cannot be used to communicate a chain of aliases encountered during DNS resolution
when connecting to the next hop.¶
Knowing the full chain of names that were used during DNS resolution via CNAME records [DNS] is particularly useful for clients of forward proxies, in which the client is requesting to connect to a specific target hostname using the CONNECT method [HTTP] or UDP proxying [CONNECT-UDP]. CNAME records can be used to "cloak" hosts that perform tracking or malicious activity behind more innocuous hostnames, and clients such as web browsers use the chain of DNS names to influence behavior like cookie usage policies [COOKIES] or blocking of malicious hosts.¶
This document allows clients to receive the CNAME chain of DNS names for the next hop
by including the list of names in a new next-hop-aliases
Proxy-Status parameter.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The next-hop-aliases
parameter's value is a String [STRUCTURED-FIELDS] that contains
one or more DNS names in a comma-separated list. The items in the list include all alias names and
canonical names received in CNAME records [DNS] during the course of resolving the next hop's
hostname using DNS, not including the original requested hostname itself. The names SHOULD
appear in the order in which they were received in DNS. If there are multiple CNAME records
in the chain, the first name in the next-hop-aliases
list would be the value in the CNAME
record for the original hostname, and the final name in the next-hop-aliases
list would
be the name that ultimately resolved to one or more addresses.¶
The list of DNS names in next-hop-aliases
uses a comma (",") as a separator between names.
Note that if a comma is included in a name itself, the comma must be encoded as described in
Section 2.1.¶
For example, consider a proxy "proxy.example.net" that receives the following records when performing DNS resolution for the next hop "host.example.com":¶
host.example.com. CNAME tracker.example.com. tracker.example.com. CNAME service1.example.com. service1.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::1¶
The proxy could include the following proxy status in its response:¶
This indicates that proxy.example.net, which used the IP address "2001:db8::1" as the next hop
for this request, encountered the names "tracker.example.com" and "service1.example.com"
in the DNS resolution chain. Note that while this example includes both the next-hop
and
next-hop-aliases
parameters, next-hop-aliases
can be included without including next-hop
.¶
The next-hop-aliases
parameter only applies when DNS was used to resolve the next hop's name, and
does not apply in all situations. Clients can use the information in this parameter to determine
how to use the connection established through the proxy, but need to gracefully handle situations
in which this parameter is not present.¶
The proxy MAY send the empty string ("") as the value of next-hop-aliases
to indicate that
no CNAME records were encountered when resolving the next hop's name.¶
DNS names commonly just contain alphanumeric characters and hyphens ("-"), although they are allowed to contain any character ([RFC1035], Section 3.1), including a comma. To prevent commas or other special characters in names leading to incorrect parsing, any characters that appear in names in this list that do not belong to the set of URI Unreserved Characters ([RFC3986], Section 2.3) MUST be percent-encoded as defined in [RFC3986], Section 2.1.¶
For example, consider the DNS name comma,name.example.com
. This name would be encoded
within a next-hop-aliases
parameter as follows:¶
It is also possible for a DNS name to include a period character (".") within a label,
instead of as a label separator. In this case, the period character MUST be first escaped
as "\.". Since the "\" character itself will be percent-encoded, the name
"dot\.label.example.com" would be encoded within a next-hop-aliases
parameter as follows:¶
Upon parsing this name, "dot%5C.label" MUST be treated as a single label.¶
Similarly the "\" character in a label MUST be escaped as "\\". Other uses of "\" MUST NOT appear in the label after percent-decoding.¶
In order to include the next-hop-aliases
parameter, a proxy needs to have access to the chain
of alias names and canonical names received in CNAME records.¶
Implementations ought to note that the full chain of names might not available in common DNS
resolution APIs, such as getaddrinfo
. getaddrinfo
does have an option for AI_CANONNAME
,
but this will only return the last name in the chain (the canonical name), not the alias
names.¶
An implementation MAY include incomplete information in the next-hop-aliases
parameter to accommodate cases where it is unable to include the full chain, such as only including the canonical name if the implementation can only use getaddrinfo
as described above.¶
The next-hop-aliases
parameter does not include any DNSSEC information or imply that DNSSEC was used.
The information included in the parameter can only be trusted to be valid insofar as the client
trusts the proxy to provide accurate information. This information is intended to be used as
a hint, and SHOULD NOT be used for making security decisions about the identity of a resource accessed
through the proxy.¶
Inspecting CNAME chains can be used to detect cloaking of trackers or malicious hosts. However, the
CNAME records could be omitted by a recursive or authoritative resolver that is trying to hide this form of cloaking.
In particular, recursive or authoritative resolvers can omit these records for both clients directly performing DNS name
resolution and proxies performing DNS name resolution on behalf of client. A malicious proxy could
also choose to not report these CNAME chains in order to hide the cloaking. In general, clients can
trust information included (or not included) in the next-hop-aliases
parameter to the degree
that the proxy and any resolvers used by the proxy are trusted.¶
This document registers the "next-hop-aliases" parameter in the "HTTP Proxy-Status Parameters" registry <https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-status>.¶