| ECRIT | B.R. Rosen |
| Internet-Draft | NeuStar |
| Intended status: Standards Track | H. Tschofenig |
| Expires: January 13, 2012 | Nokia Siemens Networks |
| July 12, 2011 |
Additional Data related to an Emergency Call
draft-ietf-ecrit-additional-data-00.txt
When an emergency call is sent to a PSAP, the device that sends it, as well as any service provider in the path of the call, or access network may have information about the call which the PSAP may be able to use. This document describes an XML data structure that contains this kind of information in a standardized form. A URI that points to the structure can be included in the SIP signaling with the call, or the data may be included in the body of a SIP message.
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on January 13, 2012.
Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
When an emergency call is sent to a PSAP, there is a rich set of data in the headers with the call, but the device, as well as any other service provider in the path may have even more information that would be useful to a PSAP. This information may include the identity and contact information of the service provider, subscriber identity and contact information, the type of service the service provider provides, what kind of device the user has, etc. Some kinds of devices or services have device or service dependent data. For example, a car telematics system or service may have crash information. A medical monitoring device may have sensor data. While the details of the information may vary by device or service, there needs to be a common way to send such data to a PSAP.
For the call takers this will enable more intelligent decision making and therefore better response in case of an emergency. A pre-requisite is to offer the technical capabilities to let call takers to gain access to this information stored elsewhere (granted that they have authorization to access it).
This document focuses on the data that can be obtained about a call and a mechanism for transporting it in an existing SIP header field, the Call-Info header. For this purpose a new token, namely 'emergencyCallData' is defined to be carried in the "purpose" parameter. If the "purpose" parameter set to 'emergencyCallData' then the Call-Info contains a HTTPS URL that points to a data structure with information about the call or a CID that allows the data structure to be placed in the body of the message. In addition, this document describes a "provided-by" namespace per [RFC4119] for passing information known to the access network
The data is defined as a series of "blocks" that represent a class of information. Each of the blocks is a MIME type, and an extensible set of these types constitute the data structure. A registry is defined to list the block types that may be included.
The data structure contains an element which itself is a URI that has device or service dependent data. Thus the common Additional Data about a Call defined by this document contains a 'hook', in the form of a URI for a device or service dependent data structure.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
The Additional Data about a Call is information specific to a call known by the device that sends it or a service provider in the path of a call or in the access network the call originates in. The Additional Data about a Call is a set of information blocks. Each block is a MIME type, and any set of blocks may be included in the set.
Three mechanisms are provided to transport the data set. A URI to the data set may be inserted in a SIP INVITE or MESSAGE transaction with a Call-Info header containing a purpose of "emergenyCallData". If the data is provided by reference, it may be retrieved with an HTTPS Get from the URI. The URI MUST specify an HTTPS scheme, and TLS protection for the data MUST be negotiated.
The data may be supplied by value in a SIP INVITE or MESSAGE message. In this case, Content Indirection [RFC2392] is used, with the CID URL pointing to the body of the message.
More than one Call-Info header with an emergencyCallData purpose can be expected. The device may insert one, and any intermediary service provider may insert its own. When there are multiple intermediaries each intermediary may each insert one. For example, a device may provide one, a telematics service provider may provide one and the mobile carrier handling the call may provide one.
The access network may supply Additional Data about a Call. For this purpose, this document defines a namespace and adds the namespace to the "provided-by" registry defined by [RFC4119]
Additional Data about a Call is defined as a series of blocks. Each block is defined as a mime type, with an XML data structure. MIME-multipart is used to enclose the set of blocks constituting the information provided by an entity (service provider or device). The sections below define the blocks.
This block is intended to be provided by any service provider in the path of the call or the access network provider. It includes identification and contact information. This block SHOULD be provided for every service provider in the path of the call, and the access network provider. Devices also use this block to provide identifying information. The MIME type is "addDataProviderInfo".
This block describes the service that the service provider provides to the caller. It SHOULD be included by all SPs in the path of the call. The mime type is "addCallSvcInfo"
This block provides information about the device used to place the call. It should be provided by any service provider that knows what device is being used, and by the device itself. The mime type is "addDataDevInfo".
Different data may be created by each classification; i.e., telematics creates VEDS data set - can be different types of data depending on device. May want to describe type of data for each device.
In some jurisdictions, handling of emergency calls involves information known by a service provider that must, by regulation, be passed to the emergency system. The mime type is "addCallReg".
This block describes the owner of the device (if provided by the device) or the subscriber information, if provided by a service provider. The contact location is NOT necessarily the location of the caller or incident, but is rather the nominal contact address. The mime type is "addCallSub".
NOTE: This section is not yet updated.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsd:schema
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="urn:nena:xml:ns:es:NG:Call"
targetNamespace="urn:nena:xml:ns:es:NG:Call"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified" version="1.0">
<xsd:include schemaLocation="NGTypeLib.xsd"/>
<xsd:element name="DataAssociatedWithCall">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="DataProvidedBy"
type="sourceProviderType" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element ref="CallerDataURL" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element ref="ServiceEnvironment"/>
<xsd:element ref="ServiceDeliveredByProvider"/>
<xsd:element ref="DeviceClassification"/>
<xsd:element ref="DeviceManufacturer"/>
<xsd:element name="DeviceModel" type="xsd:token"/>
<xsd:element name="DeviceID" type="xsd:token"/>
<xsd:element ref="DeviceIDType"/>
<xsd:element name="DeviceSpecificSchema"
type="ExtensionType" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element ref="PrivacyIndicator"/>
<xsd:element ref="SubscribervCARD"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="CallerDataURL" type="xsd:anyURI">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="ServiceDeliveredByProvider" type="xsd:token">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="DeviceClassification" type="xsd:token">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="DeviceManufacturer" type="xsd:token">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="DeviceIDType" type="xsd:token">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="PrivacyIndicator" type="privacyIndicatorType">
</xsd:element>
<xsd:simpleType name="privacyIndicatorType">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:token">
<xsd:enumeration value="Published"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="Non-Published"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:element name="SubscribervCARD" type="vCARDType">
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
The information in this data structure will usually be considered private. HTTPS is specified to require the provider of the information to validate the credentials of the requester. While the creation of a PKI that has global scope may be difficult, the alternatives to creating devices and services that can provide critical information securely are more daunting.
The Call-info header with purpose='emergencyCallData' MUST only be sent on an emergency call, which can be ascertained by the presence of an emergency service urn in a Route header of a SIP message.
<how recipient validates credentials of sender>
<how sender validates credentials of recipient>
<how sender validates credentials of anyone requesting device dependent data>
There is much private data in this information. Local regulations may govern what data must be provided in emergency calls, but in general, the emergency call system is often aided by the kinds of information described in this document. There is a tradeoff between the privacy considerations and the utility of the data. Certainly, if the data cannot be protected, due to failure of the TLS mechanisms described here, data not required by regulation SHOULD not be sent.
This document defines the 'emergencyCallData' value for the "purpose" parameter of the Call-Info header field. A reference to this RFC (in double brackets) has been added to the existing "purpose" Call-Info parameter entry in the SIP Parameters registry, which currently looks as follows:
Predefined
Header Field Parameter Name Values Reference
------------- -------------- --------- ---------
Call-Info purpose Yes [RFC3261][RFC5367]
This section registers the namespace specified in ??? in the provided-by registry established by RFC4119.
TBD
TBD
This section registers a new XML namespace, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688].
BEGIN
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML Basic 1.0//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/xhtml-basic10.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type"
content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1"/>
<title>Additional Data Namespace</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Namespace for Additional Data </h1>
<h2>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:additional-data</h2>
<p>See [TBD].</p>
</body>
</html>
END
This specification registers a schema, as per the guidelines in [RFC3688].
The authors would like to thank the following persons for their work in the NENA Data Technical Committee: Delaine Arnold (Data Technical Committee Chair), Marc Berryman, Erica Aubut (Data Technical Committee Vice-Chair), Susan Sherwood, Ric Atkins, Patty Bluhm, Eileen Boroski, David Connel, Maryls Davis, Paul-David de la Rosby, Gordon Chinander, David Froneberger, Marilyn Haroutunian, Roger Hixson, Rick Jones, Roger Marshall, Tom Muehleisen, Ira Pyles, Carl Reed, Susan Seet, and Skip Walls. The authors would also like to thank Tom Breen, Technical Committee Chair/Liaison; Busam, Technical Committee Vice-Chair/Liaison; Pete Eggimann, Operations Committee Chair/Liaison; Wendy Lively, Operations Committee Chair/Liaison; Roger Hixson, Technical Director; and Rick Jones, Operations Issues Director for their support and assistance.
| [RFC2119] | Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| [RFC2392] | Levinson, E., "Content-ID and Message-ID Uniform Resource Locators", RFC 2392, August 1998. |
| [RFC4119] | Peterson, J., "A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format", RFC 4119, December 2005. |
| [RFC3688] | Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, January 2004. |