Internet-Draft CoRE Target Attributes Registry March 2023
Bormann Expires 2 September 2023 [Page]
Workgroup:
CoRE Working group
Internet-Draft:
draft-ietf-core-target-attr-02
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
C. Bormann
Universität Bremen TZI

CoRE Target Attributes Registry

Abstract

The Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) specifications apply Web technologies to constrained environments. One important such technology is Web Linking (RFC 8288), which CoRE uses as the basis for a number of discovery protocols, such as the Link Format (RFC 6690) in CoAP's Resource Discovery Protocol (Section 7.2 of RFC7252) and the Resource Directory (RFC 9176).

Web Links can have target attributes, the names of which are not generally coordinated by the Web Linking specification (Section 2.2 of RFC 8288). This short note introduces an IANA registry for coordinating names of target attributes when used in Constrained RESTful Environments.

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-target-attr/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the core Working Group mailing list (mailto:core@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/core-wg/core-target-attr.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 2 September 2023.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

The Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) specifications apply Web technologies to constrained environments. One important such technology is Web Linking [RFC8288], which CoRE uses as the basis for a number of discovery protocols, such as the Link Format [RFC6690] in CoAP's Resource Discovery Protocol (Section 7.2 of [RFC7252]) and the Resource Directory [RFC9176].

Web Links can have target attributes. The original Web Linking specification (Section 3 of [RFC5988]) did not attempt to coordinate names of target attributes except for providing common target attributes for use in the Link HTTP header. The current revision of that specification clarifies (Section 2.2 of [RFC8288]):

This specification does not attempt to coordinate the name of target attributes, their cardinality, or use. Those creating and maintaining serialisations SHOULD coordinate their target attributes to avoid conflicts in semantics or syntax and MAY define their own registries of target attributes.

This short note introduces an IANA registry for coordinating names of target attributes when used in Constrained RESTful Environments, with specific instructions for the designated expert for this registry (Section 2.1).

With a registry now available, registration of target attributes is strongly encouraged. The incentive is that an unregistered attribute name might be registered with a different meaning at any time.

1.1. Terminology

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2. IANA Considerations

This specification defines a new Target Attributes sub-registry in the CoRE Parameters registry [IANA.core-parameters], with the policy "Expert Review" (Section 4.5 of [BCP26]).

2.1. Instructions for the Designated Expert

The expert is instructed to be frugal in the allocation of very short target attribute names, keeping them in reserve for applications that are likely to enjoy wide use and can make good use of their shortness.

The expert is also instructed to direct the registrant to provide a specification (Section 4.6 of [BCP26]), but can make exceptions, for instance when a specification is not available at the time of registration but is likely forthcoming.

Any questions or issues that might interest a wider audience might be raised by the expert on the core-parameters@ietf.org mailing list for a time-limited discussion. This might include security considerations, or opportunities for orchestration, e.g., when different names with similar intent are being or could be registered.

If the expert becomes aware of target attributes that are deployed and in use, they may also initiate a registration on their own if they deem such a registration can avert potential future collisions.

2.2. Structure of Entries

Each entry in the registry must include:

Attribute Name:

a lower case ASCII [STD80] string that starts with a letter and can contain digits and hyphen-minus characters afterward ([a-z][-a-z0-9]*). (Note that [RFC8288] requires target attribute names to be interpreted in a case-insensitive way; the restriction to lower case here ensures that they are registered in a predictable form).

Brief description:

a brief description

Change Controller:

(see Section 2.3 of [BCP26])

Reference:

a reference document that provides a description of the target attribute, including the semantics for when the target attribute appears more than once in a link.

2.3. Initial Entries

Initial entries in this sub-registry are as listed in Table 1:

Table 1: Initial Entries in the Target Attributes Registry
Attribute Name Brief description Change Controller Reference
href reserved (not useful as target attribute name) IESG [RFC6690]
anchor reserved (not useful as target attribute name) IESG [RFC6690]
rel reserved (not useful as target attribute name) IESG [RFC6690]
rev reserved (not useful as target attribute name) IESG [RFC6690]
hreflang (Web Linking) IESG [RFC8288]
media (Web Linking) IESG [RFC8288]
title (Web Linking) IESG [RFC8288]
type (Web Linking) IESG [RFC8288]
rt resource type IESG Section 3.1 of [RFC6690]
if interface description IESG Section 3.2 of [RFC6690]
sz maximum size estimate IESG Section 3.3 of [RFC6690]
ct Content-Format hint IESG Section 7.2.1 of [RFC7252]
obs observable resource IESG Section 6 of [RFC7641]
hct HTTP-CoAP URI mapping template IESG Section 5.5 of [RFC8075]
osc hint: resource only accessible using OSCORE IESG Section 9 of [RFC8613]

A number of names are reserved as they are used for parameters in links other than target attributes, this includes a further set that is predefined in [RFC8288].

3. Security considerations

The security considerations of [RFC8288] apply, as do those of the discovery specifications [RFC6690], [RFC7252], and [RFC9176].

4. References

4.1. Normative References

[BCP26]
Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126>.
[IANA.core-parameters]
IANA, "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Parameters", <https://www.iana.org/assignments/core-parameters>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8288]
Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 8288, DOI 10.17487/RFC8288, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8288>.
[STD80]
Cerf, V., "ASCII format for network interchange", STD 80, RFC 20, DOI 10.17487/RFC0020, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc20>.

4.2. Informative References

[RFC5988]
Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 5988, DOI 10.17487/RFC5988, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5988>.
[RFC6690]
Shelby, Z., "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Link Format", RFC 6690, DOI 10.17487/RFC6690, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6690>.
[RFC7252]
Shelby, Z., Hartke, K., and C. Bormann, "The Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7252, DOI 10.17487/RFC7252, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7252>.
[RFC7641]
Hartke, K., "Observing Resources in the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 7641, DOI 10.17487/RFC7641, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7641>.
[RFC8075]
Castellani, A., Loreto, S., Rahman, A., Fossati, T., and E. Dijk, "Guidelines for Mapping Implementations: HTTP to the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP)", RFC 8075, DOI 10.17487/RFC8075, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8075>.
[RFC8613]
Selander, G., Mattsson, J., Palombini, F., and L. Seitz, "Object Security for Constrained RESTful Environments (OSCORE)", RFC 8613, DOI 10.17487/RFC8613, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8613>.
[RFC9176]
Amsüss, C., Ed., Shelby, Z., Koster, M., Bormann, C., and P. van der Stok, "Constrained RESTful Environments (CoRE) Resource Directory", RFC 9176, DOI 10.17487/RFC9176, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9176>.

Acknowledgements

The CoRE WG had been discussing setting up a registry for target attributes since the final touches were made on [RFC6690]. The update of the Web Linking specification to [RFC8288] provided the formal setting, but it took until Jaime Jiménez provided the set of initial registrations to generate a first version of this specification. The current version addresses additional input and working group last call comments by Esko Dijk, Marco Tiloca, and Thomas Fossati.

Contributors

Jaime Jiménez
Ericsson

Jaime provided the list of initial registrations.

Author's Address

Carsten Bormann
Universität Bremen TZI
Postfach 330440
D-28359 Bremen
Germany