Internet-Draft | CDNI Protected Secrets Metadata | October 2023 |
Rosenblum | Expires 25 April 2024 | [Page] |
This document defines a simple mechanism for protected secret data (such as salt values or encryption keys) that may be embedded in configuration metadata or capabilities advertisements.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 April 2024.¶
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
Certain objects in both the FCI and MI interfaces encapsulate sensitive values, such as credentials and access keys, which should not necessarily be accessible to all parties that can view the advertisement and configuration payloads.¶
This document defines two mechanisms to enclose secret values in the context of other FCI and MI objects that may only be viewed by the intended recipients, including embedded secrets encrypted using a certificate supplied by a counterparty and secrets stored in an external service (support defined in this draft is specifically for HashiCorp Vault), which are accessed via a specified path and a key ID. Refer to [HCVAULT] documentation.for details.¶
Either side can share secrets, and the functionality is the same for both sides,, so the FCI capabilities are wrappers around the MI objects, similar to how FCI footprints (used in [RFC8008]) reutilize the MI.Footprint and registry defined in [RFC8006]¶
The public certificate for the downstream content delivery network (dCDN) is shared via FCI.SecretCertificate and the certificate for the upstream content delivery network (uCDN) is shared via MI.SecretCertificate.¶
Overview of the workflow for embedded secrets:¶
uCDN receives an advertisement with FCI.SecretStore and FCI.SecretCertificate. As the uCDN has not yet provided a certificate, any embedded secret values in the advertisement are omitted; the dCDN is not yet able to encrypt the secrets, so no secrets are present.¶
uCDN provides configuration including MI.SecretStore and MI.SecretValue with values encrypted using the dCDN certificate.¶
uCDN receives an updated capabilities advertisement; having provided an MI.SecretCertificate, the advertisement SHOULD now contain populated MI.SecretValue objects if secret values are utilized, encrypted with the provided certificate.¶
[ Placeholder for Sequence Diagram ]¶
Detailed workflow examples, including modes that reference external services or contain secret values in plaintext, are available in the Workflow Examples (Section 5) section.¶
The MI.SecretValue objects are utilized in the FCI and MI interfaces, where secrets must be referenced.¶
Certificates can be validated based on signatures in production environments, and self-signed certificates can be accepted in testing/lab environments. With this model, no out-of-band communication is required to share secrets.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].¶
MI.SecretStore instructs the counterparty how to dereference the value of any MI.SecretValue objects linked to the store.¶
For embedded stores, MI.SecretStore identifies the certificate used for encrypting the values. For external stores (e.g., HashiCorp Vault), MI.SecretStore specifies the service endpoint that should be used in conjunction with the MI.SecretValue key path to obtain the secure data.¶
Property: secret-store-id¶
Description: A unique identifier for this store configuration that is referenced from linked MI.SecretValue objects.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: secret-store-type¶
Description: A type discriminator for the configuration object, this property specifies whether the linked MI.SecretValue objects contain embedded secret objects or reference an external store.¶
Type: String. Either MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded or MI.SecretStoreTypeHashiCorpVault.¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: secret-store-config¶
MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded contains the configuration necessary to decrypt embedded secrets in MI.SecretValue.¶
The only currently supported encrypted message format is Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) as defined in [RFC5652] Messages MUST be CMS type "EnvelopedData" and Base64 encoded.¶
A cleartext format is also defined for testing purposes. In this case, the value of an MI.SecretValue object's secret-value property is the cleartext secret. It is NOT RECOMMENDED to use the cleartext format in production environments.¶
Property: format¶
Description: The format of the embedded encrypted message.¶
Type: String. Either "cms" or "cleartext".¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: secret-certificate-id¶
Description: The ID of the MI.SecretStoreCertificate used to encrypt secret messages linked with this store configuration.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: No¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded specifying use of CMS:¶
MI.SecretStoreTypeHashiCorpVault contains the configuration necessary to reference secrets stored in an external instance of a HashiCorp Vault KV store [HCVAULT].¶
MI.SecretValue objects reference secrets stored in the Vault using the secret-path property to identify the path and property key. See the MI.SecretValue (Section 3.4) section for details.¶
Property: endpoint¶
Property: namespace¶
Description: The Vault namespace in which secret lookups should be performed.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: version¶
Description: The Vault KV version.¶
Type: Integer. Valid values: 1 or 2.¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretStoreTypeHashiCorpVault specifying a version KV-V1 Vault:¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretStoreTypeHashiCorpVault specifying a version KV-V2 Vault:¶
MI.SecretValue may be used in any FCI or MI object where sensitive data must be transmitted only to intended recipients.¶
Property: secret-store-id¶
Description: The ID of MI.SecretStore that contains the configuration defining how to decrypt or access the referenced secret.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: secret-value¶
Description: Used only for embedded secrets, the Base64 encoded value of a CMS message or the cleartext string, depending on the defined MI.SecretStore configuration.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: No¶
Property: secret-path¶
Description: Used only for HashiCorp Vault secrets, the path, not including namespace, to the secret, including the key of the particular property to access as the last path parameter.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: No¶
Property: timeout¶
Description: If this property is present and the elapsed time since last retrieving the secret value has exceeded this timeout, any cached instance of this secret value MUST be discarded and fetched again from the associated secret store.¶
Type: Integer duration in seconds.¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: No¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretValue specifying an embedded value:¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretValue for a Vault:¶
MI.SecretCertificate is used to share an [X.509] certificate to be utilized for encrypting embedded secret messages.¶
In lab and testing environments, this certificate MAY be self-signed, depending on participant agreement.¶
In production environments, this SHOULD be a certificate signed by an appropriate certificate authority (CA) and validated by the counterparty.¶
Property: certificate-id¶
Description: A unique ID for this certificate that can be referenced from a corresponding MI.SecretStore configuration defined by a counterparty.¶
Type: String¶
Mandatory-to-Specify: Yes¶
Property: certificate-value¶
The following is an example of MI.SecretCertificate:¶
These objects are simple capability wrappers around the MI objects defined in this specification.¶
FCI.SecretStore instructs the uCDN how to dereference the value of any MI.SecretValue objects linked to the store from other FCI objects via an embedded MI.SecretValue object. For further details, see the MI.SecretStore (Section 3.1) section.¶
The following is an example of FCI.SecretStore:¶
FCI.SecretCertificate is used to share an [X.509] certificate to be utilized for encrypting embedded secret messages via an embedded MI.SecretCertificate object. For further details, see the MI.SecretCertificate (Section 3.5) section.¶
The following is an example of FCI.SecretCertificate:¶
The facilities in this document can be used for simple and bidirectional exchange of secret values between uCDN and dCDN participants in an Open Caching system. The embedded model provides for a secret exchange without reference to out-of-band services, while the Vault support allows for external reference to secrets stored in a HashiCorp Vault.¶
Participants utilizing a secret distribution method or service not supported here MAY define a Private Feature MI object [SVTA2038] with the necessary configuration for that method or service and then utilize that MI object within MI.SecretStore and FCI.SecretStore¶
Provided below are workflow examples for uCDN -> dCDN and dCDN -> uCDN exchanges of secret values.¶
Consideration is needed when addressing key rollover, expiration, and revocation in the embedded model. The RECOMMENDED workflow for key rollover is as follows:¶
When the recipient of a secret provides an updated configuration that no longer contains an MI.SecretCertificate with an ID referenced in an MI.SecretStore used by MI.SecretValue objects, those MI.SecretValue objects SHOULD be reduced to an object with no contained secret-value property as they would be in the initial state before any certificate had been provided.¶
If the recipient of a secret then provides a new MI.SecretCertificate object, the sender of the secret SHOULD update its MI.SecretStore to reference the new certificate-id and then update any referencing MI.SecretValue objects to include an updated secret-value property that contains the newly encrypted values.¶
The uCDN advertises FCI.SecretStore with a store-type of MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded; other FCI objects may contain MI.SecretValue objects that reference the store-id. MI.SecretValue objects do not presently contain a secret-value property.¶
The dCDN pushes the MI configuration with an MI.SecretCertificate.¶
The uCDN updates the advertised FCI.SecretStore with a certificate-id property that references the dCDN MI.SecretCertificate; any MI.SecretValue objects in other FCI objects now contain a secret-value property with the CMS encrypted secret.¶
The uCDN advertises an FCI.SecretCertificate.¶
The dCDN pushes the MI configuration containing MI.SecretStore with a store-type of MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded and a certificate-id referencing the FCI.SecretCertificate advertised by the uCDN. Other MI objects may contain MI.SecretValue objects with a secret-value property containing the CMS encrypted secret.¶
The dCDN advertises an FCI.SecretStore with an appropriate configuration for accessing an instance of a HashiCorp Vault accessible to the uCDN. Other FCI objects may contain MI.SecretValue objects that reference the FCI.SecretStore and a secret-path property specifying the secret to retrieve.¶
The uCDN provides the MI configuration, including an MI.SecretStore with appropriate configuration for accessing an instance of a HashiCorp Vault accessible to the dCDN. Other MI objects may contain MI.SecretValue objects that reference the MI.SecretStore and a secret-path property specifying the secret to retrieve.¶
The FCI and MI objects defined in the present document are transferred via the interfaces defined in CDNI [RFC8006] which describes how to secure these interfaces protecting integrity and confidentiality while ensuring the authenticity of the dCDN and uCDN.¶
This document requests the registration of the following entries under the "CDNI Payload Types" registry hosted by IANA:¶
Payload Type | Specification |
MI.SecretStore | RFCthis |
MI.SecretStoreTypeEmbedded | RFCthis |
MI.SecretStoreTypeVault | RFCthis |
MI.SecretValue | RFCthis |
MI.SecretCertificate | RFCthis |
FCI.SecretStore | RFCthis |
FCI.SecretCertificate | RFCthis |
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the members of the Streaming Video Technology Alliance [SVTA] Open Caching Working Group for their guidance / contribution / reviews ...)¶
Particulary the following people contribute in one or other way to the content of this draft:¶