Internet-Draft | ISIS for BIER-TE | January 2024 |
Chen, et al. | Expires 10 July 2024 | [Page] |
This document describes IS-IS extensions for distributing the BitPositions configured on a Bit-Forwarding Router (BFR) in a "Bit Index Explicit Replication Traffic Engineering" (BIER-TE) domain.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 10 July 2024.¶
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
[RFC9262] introduces Bit Index Explicit Replication (BIER) Traffic/Tree Engineering (BIER-TE). It is an architecture for per-packet stateless explicit point to multipoint (P2MP) multicast path/tree. There are three types of BitPositions (BPs) in a BIER-TE domain: link BitPosition (BP), routed BP and localdecap BP. A link BP is a BP configured on a link from Bit-Forwarding Router (BFR) X to BFR Y for a forward connected adjacency from X to Y. A routed BP is a BP configured on BFR X for a forward routed adjacency from X to a remote BFR Z not directly connected to X. A localdecap BP is a BP configured on a BFR.¶
[RFC8401] describes IS-IS Extensions for distributing the BFR identifier (BFR-id) configured on a BFR. This document specifies IS-IS extensions for distributing the BitPositions configured a BFR in a BIER-TE domain. The BitPositions distributed may be used by a BFR as a Point of Local Repair (PLR) for Fast-ReRoute (FRR).¶
This section describes protocol extensions to IS-IS for distributing the BitPositions configured on a BFR in a BIER-TE domain.¶
An Extended IS Reachability TLV (Type 22) defined in [RFC5305] may contain Sub-TLVs (such as those for TE) that apply to a link/interface to a neighbor. To encode multiple links or interfaces to neighbors, the structure inside TLV is repeated.¶
MT Intermediate Systems TLV (Type 222) defined in [RFC5120] may contain Sub-TLVs (such as those for TE) that apply to a link/interface. It is aligned with Extended IS Reachability TLV (Type 22) beside an additional two bytes in front at the beginning of the TLV for MT-ID.¶
Link-BP Sub-TLV of the following format is defined and used in Extended IS Reachability TLV (Type 22) and/or MT Intermediate Systems TLV (Type 222) to advertise a link BP.¶
No Sub-Sub-TLVs are currently defined.¶
A Sub-TLV, called Node BPs Sub-TLV, is defined and carried within the TLVs 235, 237 [RFC5120], 135 [RFC5305], or 236 [RFC5308]. It contains Sub-Sub-TLVs. Two types of Sub-Sub-TLVs are defined. One is for a Routed BitPosition and the other for a Localdecap BitPosition. The Node BPs Sub-TLV has the following format:¶
The Routed-BP Sub-Sub-TLV has the following format:¶
The Localdecap-BP Sub-Sub-TLV has the following format:¶
Protocol extensions defined in this document do not affect the IS-IS security.¶
Under "IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Neighbor Information" registry, IANA is requested to assign a new Sub-TLV Type for Link BP as follows:¶
+=======+=============+==+==+==+===+===+===+=============+ | Type |Description |22|23|25|141|222|223|reference | +=======+=============+==+==+==+===+===+===+=============+ | TBD1 | Link BP |y |y |n | n | y | y |This document| +-------+-------------+--+--+--+---+---+---+-------------+¶
Under "IS-IS Sub-TLVs for TLVs Advertising Prefix Reachability" registry, IANA is requested to assign a new Sub-TLV Type for Node BPs as follows:¶
+=======+=============+==+===+===+===+===+=============+ | Type |Description |27|135|235|236|237|reference | +=======+=============+==+===+===+===+===+=============+ | TBD2 | Node BPs |n | y | y | y | y |This document| +-------+-------------+--+---+---+---+---+-------------+¶
IANA is requested to create a new sub-registry "Sub-Sub-TLVs for Node BPs Sub-TLV" as follows:¶
+==============+===================+=====================+ | Type | Name | reference | +==============+===================+=====================+ | 0 | Reserved | +--------------+-------------------+---------------------+ | 1 | Routed BP | This document | +--------------+-------------------+---------------------+ | 2 | Localdecap BP | This document | +--------------+-------------------+---------------------+ | 3 - 255 | Unassigned | +--------------+-------------------+---------------------+¶
The authors would like to thank Acee Lindem, Les Ginsberg, Tony Przygienda, Jeffrey Zhang and Toerless Eckert for their comments on this work.¶