Internet-Draft | MUST NOT DNSSEC with ECC-GOST | May 2024 |
Hardaker & Kumari | Expires 15 November 2024 | [Page] |
This document retires the use of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 15 November 2024.¶
Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶
The ECC-GOST algorithm [RFC5933] has been depreciated and [RFC5933] has been made historic. Thus, the use of ECC-GOST is no longer needed and is not recommend for use in DNSSEC [RFC4033] [RFC4034] [RFC4035].¶
This document retires the use of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC.¶
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶
The GOST R 34.11-94 [RFC5933] algorithm MUST NOT be used when creating DS records. Validating resolvers MUST treat GOST R 34.11-94 DS records as insecure. If no other DS records of accepted cryptographic algorithms are available, the DNS records below the delegation point MUST be treated as insecure.¶
The ECC-GOST [RFC5933] algorithm MUST NOT be used when creating DNSKEY and RRSIG records. Validating resolvers MUST treat RRSIG records created from DNSKEY records using these algorithms as an unsupported algorithm. If no other RRSIG records of accepted cryptographic algorithms are available, the validating resolver MUST consider the associated resource records as Insecure.¶
This document increases the security of the DNSSEC ecosystem by deprecating algorithms that make use of older algorithms with ECC-GOST derived uses.¶
Zone owners currently making use of ECC-GOST based algorithms should immediate switch to algorithms with stronger cryptographic strengths, such as those listed in the introduction. DNS registries [RFC8499] should prohibit their clients to upload and publish ECC-GOST based DS records.¶
IANA is requested to set the "DNSSEC Validation" of the "Digest Algorithms" registry [DS-IANA] for GOST R 34.11-94 (3) to MUST NOT.¶
IANA is requested to set the "Recommended for DNSSEC Validation" column of the DNS Security Algorithm Numbers registry [DNSKEY-IANA] for ECC-GOST (23) to MUST NOT:¶
The DNSSEC scanning project by Viktor Dukhovni and Wes Hardaker highlights the current deployment of various algorithms on the https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/ website.¶
[RFC Editor: please delete this section upon publication]¶
While this document is under development, it can be viewed, tracked, fill here:¶
https://github.com/hardaker/draft-hardaker-dnsop-must-not-gost¶