EAT Measured Component

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶

This Internet-Draft will expire on 4 September 2024.¶

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.¶

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

Section 4.2.16 of [I-D.ietf-rats-eat] defines a Measurements claim that:¶

• "[c]ontains descriptions, lists, evidence or measurements of the software that exists on the entity or any other measurable subsystem of the entity."¶

This claim allows for different measurement formats, each identified by a different CoAP Content-Format (Section 12.3 of [RFC7252]). Initially, the only specified format is CoSWID of type "evidence", as per Section 2.9.4 of [RFC9393].¶

This document introduces the "measured components" format that can be used with the EAT Measurements claim in addition or as an alternative to CoSWID.¶

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.¶

In this document, CDDL [RFC8610] [RFC9165] [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-modules] [I-D.ietf-cbor-cddl-more-control] is used to describe the data formats.¶

3. Information Model

A measured component information element includes the computed digest on the software or configuration payload, along with metadata that helps in identifying the measurement and the authorizing entity for component installation.¶

Table 1 describes the information model of a measured component.¶

4. Data Model

The data model is inspired by the "PSA software component" claim (Section 4.4.1 of [I-D.tschofenig-rats-psa-token]), which has been slightly refactored to take into account the recommendations about new EAT claims design in Appendix E of [I-D.ietf-rats-eat].¶

The following types and semantics have been reused:¶

• COSE Key Thumbprint [I-D.ietf-cose-key-thumbprint], for signer and countersigners;¶

• CoSWID software name and version [RFC9393], for component name and version;¶

• CoRIM digest [I-D.ietf-rats-corim], for digest value and algorithm.¶

measured-component = [
  id:               component-id
  measurement:      corim.digest
  signer:           ckt
  ? countersigners: [ + ckt ]
]

; COSE Key Thumbprint
ckt = bytes

component-id = [
  name:      text
  ? version: version
]

;# import $version-scheme from rfc9393 as coswid

version = [
  val:      text
  ? scheme: coswid.$version-scheme
]

; eventually: ";#import digest from rfcxxxx as corim"

corim.digest = [
  alg: (int / text)
  val: bytes
]

$mc-cbor = bstr .cbor measured-component
$mc-json = tstr .json measured-component

EAT CBOR (`.feature "cbor"`)
$measurements-body-cbor /= $mc-cbor            ; native
$measurements-body-cbor /= tstr .b64u $mc-json ; tunnel

; EAT JSON (`.feature "json"`)
$measurements-body-json /= $mc-json            ; native
$measurements-body-json /= tstr .b64u $mc-cbor ; tunnel

5. Examples

(The examples are CBOR only. JSON examples will be added in a future version of this document.)¶

The example in Figure 1 is a measured component with all the fields populated.¶

[
  / id / [
    / name / "boot loader X",
    / version / [
      "1.2.3rc2",
      16384 / semver /
    ]
  ],
  / measurement / [
    / alg / "sha-256",
    / val / h'3996003d486fb91ffb056f7d03f2b2992b215b31dbe7af4b37
              3431fc7d319da3'
  ],
  / signer / h'492e9b676c21f6012b1ceeb9032feb4141a880797355f6675
              015ec59c51ca1ec',
  / countersigners / [
    h'4277bb97ba7b51577a0d38151d3e08b40bdf946753f5b5bdeb814d6ff5
      7a8a5e'
  ]
]

The example in Figure 2 is the same measured component as above but used as the format of a measurements claim in a EAT claims-set.¶

Note that the example uses a CoAP Content-Format value from the experimental range (65000), which will change to the value assigned by IANA for the application/measured-component+cbor Content-Format.¶

Note also that the array contains only one measured component, but additional entries could be added if the measured TCB is made of multiple, individually measured components.¶

{
  273: [
    [
      65000, / using a CoAP C-F from the experimental range /
      <<
        [
          / id / [
            / name / "boot loader X",
            / version / [
              "1.2.3rc2",
              16384 / semver /
            ]
          ],
          / measurement / [
            / alg / "sha-256",
            / val / h'3996003d486fb91ffb056f7d03f2b2992b215b31db
                      e7af4b373431fc7d319da3'
          ],
          / signer / h'492e9b676c21f6012b1ceeb9032feb4141a880797
                      355f6675015ec59c51ca1ec',
          / countersigners / [
            h'4277bb97ba7b51577a0d38151d3e08b40bdf946753f5b5bdeb
              814d6ff57a8a5e'
          ]
        ]
      >>
    ]
  ]
}

6. Security Considerations

TODO¶

7. IANA Considerations

RFC Editor: replace "RFCthis" with the RFC number assigned to this document.¶

Appendix A. Collected CDDL

TODO¶

Appendix B. Open Issues

The list of currently open issues for this documents can be found at https://github.com/thomas-fossati/draft-fft-rats-eat-measured-component/issues.¶

Note to RFC Editor: please remove before publication.¶

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank TBD for their comments, reviews and suggestions.¶

Authors' Addresses