| Internet-Draft | BGP Ext. Com. Registries Update | April 2020 |
| Loibl | Expires 22 October 2020 | [Page] |
This document updates several BGP Extended Community registries in order to replace the "Experimental Use" registration procedure in some entries, since their use is clearly not experimental and thus misleading.¶
This document updates RFC7153.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on 22 October 2020.¶
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶
[RFC7153] reorganizes the IANA registries for the type values and sub-type values of the BGP Extended Communities attribute. As a result the IANA maintained registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended Community Types" includes a range of Type Values (0x80-0x8F) with Experimental Use registration procedure. Out of this experimental range the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 have been assigned via [RFC5575] and [RFC7674]. The primary use for those types and sub-type registries is non experimental.¶
Section 2 of this document requests the registry cleanup to reflect the actual use of those code-points (removing "Experimental Use" from the sub-type registry names) and changes the registration procedure of the types 0x80, 0x81, 0x82 to first come first serve.¶
IANA maintains a registry entitled "BGP Transitive Extended Community Types". IANA is requested to update the Name of the Type Values according to Table 1 and append a reference to this document to the existing references.¶
| Type Value | Name | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0x80 | Generic Transitive Extended Community (Sub-Types are defined in the "Generic Transitive Extended Community Sub-Types" Registry) | [add this document] |
| 0x81 | Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 2 (Sub-Types are defined in the "Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 2 Sub-Types" Registry) | [add this document] |
| 0x82 | Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 3 (Sub-Types are defined in the "Generic Transitive Extended Community Part 3 Sub-Types" Registry) | [add this document] |
Furthermore IANA is requested to change the registration procedures of this registry of Type Values 0x80 thru 0x82 to First Come First Serve. The resulting Registration Procedures should read as in Table 2.¶
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0x00-0x3f | First Come First Served |
| 0x80-0x82 | First Come First Served (see [this document]) |
| 0x83-0x8f | Reserved for Experimental Use (see [RFC3692]) |
| 0x90-0xbf | Standards Action |
IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community Sub-Types". IANA is requested update the registry title to:¶
IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community Part 2 Sub-Types". IANA is requested update the registry title to:¶
IANA maintains a registry entitled "Generic Transitive Experimental Use Extended Community Part 3 Sub-Types". IANA is requested update the registry title to:¶
There are no direct security considerations arising from this document.¶
The author wants to thank Alvaro Retana, who pointed out, that the IANA registry contains misleading entries in this context.¶